Obama's stimulus victory
Why the $789 billion bill might have a higher political cost
President Obama won a “quick, sweet victory,” said Richard Stevenson in The New York Times, when Congressional leaders agreed to a $789 billion economic stimulus bill Wednesday night. But it was not the kind of victory he had hoped for. His inability to win over more than “a handful of Republicans” was a political “loss of innocence,” and the big price tag could hamper his ambitious domestic agenda.
Getting his bill through “wasn’t pretty,” said John Dickerson in Slate, in part because he chose the “fierce urgency of now” approach over “transparency or a thorough think about things.” The House and Senate bills were reconciled “mostly in secret” by White House aides, Democratic leaders, and three Northeastern Republicans. That’s “hardly unusual,” but it’s “not the change Obama promised.”
Why should Republicans have been invited to the table? said John Cole in Balloon Juice. The GOP provided a total of three votes in both houses for the bill, and those three helped finalize the bill. The rest of the party “demagogued, lied, whined, and had a hissy fit about the bill,” even though it was “loaded with tax cuts designed to please Republicans.” Want some say? Bring some votes.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Given their lack of power, Congressional Republicans are actually “playing their hand extraordinarily well,” said Karl Rove in The Wall Street Journal. House Republicans in particular have used the increasingly unpopular bill to “redefine their party” and make Obama and the Democrats own the spending glut. Obama “won this legislative battle, but at a high price”—he “re-energized the GOP.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How generative AI is changing the way we write and speak
In The Spotlight ChatGPT and other large language model tools are quietly influencing which words we use
-
Can Nato keep Donald Trump happy?
Today's Big Question Military alliance pulls out all the stops to woo US president on his peacemaker victory lap
-
Easy Money: the Charles Ponzi Story – an 'enlightening' podcast
The Week Recommends Apple Original podcast explores the 'fascinating' tale of the man who gave the investment scam its name
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy