Cheney: Infallible to the very end
What should the country make of Dick Cheney's exit interviews? Was he a "rare vice president who mattered" or was he "trapped in his bunker"?
Dick Cheney has a final message for everyone appalled by the record of the past eight years, said The New York Times in an editorial. Quit whining—things are great! Seeking to fashion a glittering legacy from the tatters of his White House tenure, our sneering vice president has been giving interviews in which he’s completely rewriting history, portraying the past eight years as a beneficent reign of unerring judgment. In Cheney’s alternate universe, Iraq was not a foolhardy, immensely costly war sold on false premises, but the “right thing to do.” The torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib had nothing at all to do with the illegal interrogation techniques Cheney championed. And the “crippling” budget deficit owes nothing to the administration’s reckless tax cuts for the wealthy. As for the 70 percent or so of Americans who think he and Bush did a lousy job, what do they know?
Complain all you want, said Paul Mirengoff in The Philadelphia Inquirer, but Cheney was a rare vice president who mattered. “By exerting maximum influence early in the war on terrorism, Cheney set its course.” His aggressive campaign to put al Qaida on the defensive, including harsh interrogations of detainees, was critical in keeping the U.S. safe from terrorist attacks for seven years. Cheney not only had the courage of his convictions, said William Kristol in The New York Times, but he was that rare politician with the guts to speak the unvarnished, unpopular truth. As his exit interviews demonstrate, with Cheney you get “no spin. No double talk.”
Put yourself in Cheney’s shoes, said Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post, and it’s easier to understand why he went off the deep end. The 9/11 attacks created “chaos and anguish” in Washington, leaving senior White House officials frantic to stop al Qaida from killing more Americans. Over time, however, visceral reactions and panic “are supposed to give way to reasoned analysis.” For Cheney, that “never happened,” and the administration’s pre-emptive torture and wiretapping tactics “dishonored our nation’s most precious ideals.” And to what end? asked Dahlia Lithwick in Slate.com. Several intelligence interrogators and FBI Director Robert Mueller have said that torturing al Qaida suspects produced mostly bad information, and stopped no terrorist attacks. So where does that leave Cheney? Trapped in his bunker, insisting to the end that torture isn’t a war crime, that the Constitution says what he says it does, and that everyone else is stupid, traitorous, and wrong.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'The winners and losers of AI may not be where we expect'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Shingles vaccine cuts dementia risk, study finds
Speed Read Getting vaccinated appears to significantly reduce the chances of developing Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Judge ends Eric Adams case, Trump leverage
Speed Read Federal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams were dismissed, as requested by Trump's Justice Department
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published