The Democrats' big plans
What will Obama and his party do with their mandate?
Barack Obama's victory is proof of a fundamental realignment in American politics, said John Judis in The New Republic online. So the president-elect should ignore the advice to "go slow." If Obama and the Democrats who now dominate Congress "act boldly," they can arrest the economic downturn by spending big on infrastructure and by adopting national health insurance. That will have the added benefit of laying "the basis for an enduring majority."
Obama's first big test will be resisting the temptation to overreach, said Ruth Marcus in The Washington Post. After spending eight years in the wilderness, "the leftward precincts of his party are not inclined toward either compromise or patience." But Obama will have greater success over the long haul if he avoids the early defeats that robbed Bill Clinton of momentum as a new president when he skewed too far to the left.
There's every reason to expect Democrats to "stream into Washington and dive into the federal treasury" with giddy abandon, said Jonah Goldberg in the New York Post. That would be bad for the country, but good for Republicans. Unless Obama sticks to his promises, "mostly implied," of centrism and moderation, voters will fire Democrats in 2010 the way they just fired Republicans.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Reality will be enough to keep Democratic power in check, said Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, also in the New York Post. Obama will take office with a clear mandate, but "as the economy falters, he'll find himself unable to raise taxes as he wants and stymied in his plans for government takeover."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why the weather keeps getting 'stuck'
In the Spotlight Record hot and dry spring caused by 'blocked' area of high pressure above the UK
-
Can Starmer sell himself as the 'tough on immigration' PM?
Today's Big Question Former human rights lawyer 'now needs to own the change – not just mouth the slogans' to win over a sceptical public
-
UK-India trade deal: how the social security arrangements will work
The Explainer A National Insurance exemption in the UK-India trade deal is causing concern but should British workers worry?
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy