Does a suicide close the anthrax case?
A government researcher died as his arrest neared.
What happened
A top government scientist committed suicide Friday as the Justice Department prepared to charge him in connection with the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks. Bruce E. Ivins, 62, had helped the FBI analyze samples from the attacks and worked at an elite government biodefense research laboratory. He took an overdose of prescription Tylenol mixed with codeine after being told he would be prosecuted. (Los Angeles Times)
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The Justice Department just can’t win in the long-running Anthrax investigation,” said Dan Slater in The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog. Last month, it had to agree to a $5.8 million-dollar settlement with former Army scientist Steven Hatfill, who said his life was destroyed after word leaked that he was a “person of interest” in the attacks. And now this.
The deal with Hatfill was a sure sign that investigators believed they had their man, said legal expert Jonathan Turley in his blog. And Ivins’ suicide seems to confirm it. But given the FBI's “outrageous conduct with regard to Hatfill, it is dangerous to jump to any conclusions about Ivins.”
“Unfortunately, the U.S. will not get its day in court,” said Ed Morrissey in a Hot Air blog. If Ivins really was the one who “murdered five people and frightened a nation already reeling from the 9/11 attack,” he cheated us all by taking the easy way out. The nation deserves an explanation.
It would still be “extremely helpful to know exactly what happened,” said Steven Taylor in the Outside the Beltway blog. Coming on the heels of 9/11, those attacks helped “catapult the nation” into a “generalized war against terrorist groups.” If envelopes of deadly white powder mailed to Congress and journalists were the handiwork of “a mentally unstable government microbiologist,” we all read too much into them.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Thunder beat Pacers to clinch NBA Finals
Speed Read Oklahoma City Thunder beat the Indiana Pacers in Game 7 of the NBA Finals
-
Judges order release of 2 high-profile migrants
Speed Read Kilmar Ábrego García is back in the US and Mahmoud Khalil is allowed to go home — for now
-
US assessing bomb damage to Iran nuclear sites
Speed Read Trump claims this weekend's US bombing obliterated Tehran's nuclear program, while JD Vance insists the US is 'not at war with Iran'
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy