Does a suicide close the anthrax case?
A government researcher died as his arrest neared.
What happened
A top government scientist committed suicide Friday as the Justice Department prepared to charge him in connection with the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks. Bruce E. Ivins, 62, had helped the FBI analyze samples from the attacks and worked at an elite government biodefense research laboratory. He took an overdose of prescription Tylenol mixed with codeine after being told he would be prosecuted. (Los Angeles Times)
What the commentators said
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The Justice Department just can’t win in the long-running Anthrax investigation,” said Dan Slater in The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog. Last month, it had to agree to a $5.8 million-dollar settlement with former Army scientist Steven Hatfill, who said his life was destroyed after word leaked that he was a “person of interest” in the attacks. And now this.
The deal with Hatfill was a sure sign that investigators believed they had their man, said legal expert Jonathan Turley in his blog. And Ivins’ suicide seems to confirm it. But given the FBI's “outrageous conduct with regard to Hatfill, it is dangerous to jump to any conclusions about Ivins.”
“Unfortunately, the U.S. will not get its day in court,” said Ed Morrissey in a Hot Air blog. If Ivins really was the one who “murdered five people and frightened a nation already reeling from the 9/11 attack,” he cheated us all by taking the easy way out. The nation deserves an explanation.
It would still be “extremely helpful to know exactly what happened,” said Steven Taylor in the Outside the Beltway blog. Coming on the heels of 9/11, those attacks helped “catapult the nation” into a “generalized war against terrorist groups.” If envelopes of deadly white powder mailed to Congress and journalists were the handiwork of “a mentally unstable government microbiologist,” we all read too much into them.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Is a social media ban for teens the answer?Talking Point Australia is leading the charge in banning social media for people under 16 — but there is lingering doubt as to the efficacy of such laws
-
Magazine crossword: 1499Puzzles The weekly crossword from The Week
-
Political cartoons for January 16Cartoons Friday’s political cartoons include the Nobel Peace prize, the wrong island, and more
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred