Al-Maliki’s big boost for Obama’s campaign
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki essentially endorsed Obama’s 16-month timetable to withdraw most U.S. forces from Iraq.
What happened
On the first leg of a world tour designed to strengthen his foreign-policy credibility, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama got what he came for when Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki essentially endorsed Obama’s timetable to withdraw most U.S. forces from Iraq. Al-Maliki, who had told a German magazine several days earlier that Obama’s 16-month time frame was both desirable and “realistic,” repeated that assertion in a meeting with Obama. “The Iraqi government sees that the end of 2010 is an appropriate date for the withdrawal of the forces,” the prime minister’s spokesman later said. Al-Maliki’s statements were a blow to Republican John McCain, who insists that a timetable for withdrawal would undermine Iraq’s evolution into a stable, democratic nation. “Sen. Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a politician campaign,” McCain said.
On his tour, Obama visited Afghanistan and the Middle East, using the cinematic backdrop of war zones and grand diplomatic venues to create a presidential aura. Before heading off to Europe, he met with a host of foreign leaders and American military brass, including the U.S.’s top commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus. Coverage of the trip was so extensive—all three network anchors went along—and largely positive that the McCain campaign complained that the media had “a bizarre fascination” with Obama.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
It’s very obvious what just happened in Iraq, said The New York Sun. Al-Maliki now believes Obama will win the election, and by publicly endorsing his withdrawal plan, the prime minister is simultaneously appeasing restless Iraqi voters and betting on an Obama victory. This back-stabbing of President Bush and McCain “has to be one of the most stunning pieces of political nerve in memory.”
In reality, “neither U.S. commanders nor Iraq’s principal political leaders” support Obama’s plan, said The Washington Post. When his statements are examined closely, al-Maliki’s timetable extends beyond Obama’s by at least seven months. Obama himself acknowledged that Petraeus “does not want a timetable,” and Sunni leaders in Iraq’s Anbar province told Obama that a rapid drawdown of U.S. troops there would likely lead to renewed violence among rival sects. Obama claims he’ll be flexible and respond to conditions on the ground, but his reflexive, anti-war stance against the troop surge raises questions about his judgment.
What the columnists said
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
McCain is now the odd man out, said Ross Douthat in TheAtlantic.com. On troop withdrawals, “he’s trying to claim that he, Bush, and the Iraqis are all on the same page” while “Obama’s way out in left field.” Trouble is, al-Maliki and Obama now basically agree, while even President Bush is moving toward a timetable. That’s going to make it very tough for McCain to convince voters that Obama is dangerously naïve.
If Obama’s sitting pretty, said Noam Scheiber in The New Republic, “the McCain campaign has only itself to blame.” After all, it was the McCain team that “delighted in bashing Obama for his two-plus-year absence from Iraq,” equating foreign travel with foreign-policy expertise. Now that Obama’s world tour looks like “the media event of the season,” the McCain camp is reduced to sniffing about photo ops and a fawning press corps. It turns out “the problem with making an incredibly superficial critique of an opponent is that it can be rebutted incredibly superficially.”
You’d be surprised how much you can learn on a seemingly superficial “fact-finding” trip, said Iraq veteran Peter Hegseth in National Review Online. But only if you care about facts. Obama clearly came to Iraq with “an ideological approach” that was not in the least “disturbed by any single fact on the ground.” He said once again that he would oppose the surge, despite its enormous success, and simply disregarded Petraeus and the Sunni leaders, who told him 16 months is probably not enough. That tells us everything we need to know about Obama as a potential commander in chief.
What next?
A broad consensus is now developing on a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal, said John D. McKinnon in The Wall Street Journal. Under pressure from al-Maliki’s statements and Iraqi popular opinion, the White House last week said that “improving conditions” in Iraq should help create an agreement for a general “time horizon” for a withdrawal. Though the timeline remains fuzzy, the magic date for the end of the U.S. occupation would seem to be 2010.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Big Tech's answer for AI-driven job loss: universal basic income
In The Spotlight A new study reveals the strengths and limitations
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'I will not be silent' on Gaza, says Kamala Harris
Speed Read In a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Harris supported Israel's right to defend itself while expressing a desire to end Palestinian suffering
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
'How long can TikTok dominate as a social network?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published