Should Obama go to Iraq with McCain?
Barack Obama should ignore John McCain's "condescending offer" to show him around Iraq, said The Seattle Times. Refusing is certainly "consistent with the Democrats' irrational commitment to failure,
What happened
John McCain and his aides bashed Barack Obama several times this week over his call to withdraw troops from Iraq, suggesting that the Democratic presidential contender should travel to the war zone with him to see “the facts on the ground.” Obama has dismissed the idea of a joint trip as a “publicity stunt,” but said that he was considering a trip to Iraq this summer. (The Boston Globe’s Political Intelligence blog)
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
McCain’s idea for a joint trip with Obama “is one of the worst ideas I have heard in a long time,” said Karen Tumulty in Time’s Swampland blog. The security and logistical nightmare that would come with sending two presidential candidates into a “war zone is mind-boggling.” Still, it’s a good idea for our leaders to go to Iraq “in a way that maximizes the value and minimizes the fuss and distraction,” and Obama could benefit from seeing what’s changed since his last visit in 2006.
Obama should ignore “McCain's condescending offer” to show him around Iraq, said The Seattle Times in an editorial. Obama is right—“that is a political stunt” that is part of the “jolly time” McCain is having “pretending he is the only candidate with enough cachet and experience to lead the U.S. on military matters.” Obama should go to Iraq all right, but not with McCain as a “travel companion.” He should go as the candidate who’s right on Iraq, and the need to see how to end the war that McCain wants to continue.
That’s certainly “consistent with the Democrats' irrational commitment to failure,” said John Hinderaker in the blog Power Line. “Obama won't go to Iraq to size up the situation; to get our commanders' ideas on how to bring the mission to a successful conclusion; to hear from the thousands of service members who would tell him that their mission is critically important and should not be abandoned.” He’s only interested in seeing the difficulties our troops face and how to bring them home “in defeat.”
Obama indeed “might gain something” by going, said Jennifer Rubin in Commentary’s Contentions blog. He’ll at least “silence” the Republican drumbeat seeking to “embarrass” him for not having been to Iraq in more than two years. But he’ll give McCain the “upper hand” if he lets him “shame” him into making the visit.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 exclusive cartoons about Trump and Putin negotiating peace
Cartoons Artists take on alternative timelines, missing participants, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The AI arms race
Talking Point The fixation on AI-powered economic growth risks drowning out concerns around the technology which have yet to be resolved
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis world
In the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
By The Week UK Published