Victory in Basra?
The truce in southern Iraq shows how "clueless" it was for the media to declare that rebellion had erupted in Basra, said Ed Morrissey in Hot Air. Moqtada al-Sadr may have told his militiamen to put down their guns, said Kevin Drum in a Washingt
What happened
Violence dropped sharply in the southern Iraqi city of Basra after anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr called his fighters off the streets on Sunday. But there were still sporadic clashes in Baghdad, where fighting broke out after Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki launched a crackdown by Iraqi security forces on Shiite militias. (Reuters)
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So much for the “clueless” media reports suggesting that Iraq had erupted in rebellion, said Ed Morrissey in Hot Air, and was “on the brink of collapse.” Here’s what really happened: The British pullback in Basra left the city “in the hands of militias and gangsters,” and the Iraqi government regained control as soon as its security forces were strong enough. And Sadr, the “Fearless Leader” of the Mahdi Army, promptly surrendered.
It’s early to claim victory, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Sadr's forces Army might not “even heed” his orders to put down their weapons. Maliki will have to order his "fledgling" forces to keep pushing until they have taken complete control of Basra, or risk leaving the demoralizing impression that he and his army backed down after encountering “more resistance than they expected.”
Don’t believe the “rosy picture” President Bush is trying to paint of this bungled offensive, said Trudy Rubin in The Philadelphia Inquirer (free registration). Restoring “law and order” in Basra is a fine goal, but “the inept Maliki seems to have gotten himself in way over his head.” And by rushing in without giving the U.S. so much as a heads up, he may have undermined “the fragile gains that gave Iraqis some hope that their nightmare might finally end.”
"What a humiliation for Maliki," said Kevin Drum in Washington Monthly’s Political Animal blog. To get the troublesome cleric to put down his arms, Maliki’s allies had to go—on their own initiative, not Maliki’s—to Sadr’s Iranian masters and ask them to stop sending him weapons. So, not only did Maliki “blink first,” but his own people “undermined what little authority he had left.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published