The warrior who sheathed his sword
Marc Garlasco has looked at war from both sides, says Josh White in The Washington Post. Garlasco works for Human Rights Watch, assessing the human toll of war and lobbying for greater deliberation in the use of military force. Five years ago, he had a st
Marc Garlasco has looked at war from both sides, says Josh White in The Washington Post. Garlasco works for Human Rights Watch, assessing the human toll of war and lobbying for greater deliberation in the use of military force. Five years ago, he had a starkly different role. As an analyst for the Defense Intelligence Agency, he targeted laser-guided bombs in Iraq. His transition from targeter to human-rights advocate did not happen overnight. An eight-year veteran of the Pentagon, Garlasco began his evolution when he went to Kosovo in 1999 to assess damage following the NATO bombing campaign. “Seeing the locals digging in the bombed-out rubble for building materials was new to me,” he says. “It was something you just don’t get when you have photos of a target and a projected death toll.” He’d always had doubts about the U.S. invasion of Iraq, but the final straw came when an airstrike he helped plan in 2003 against a high-value Iraqi target ended up killing 17 civilians instead. “I found myself standing at that crater, talking to a man about how his children were killed, and there was this bunny-rabbit toy covered in dust nearby and it tore me in two.” Garlasco says he knows war is sometimes necessary, but he wants policymakers to be clearer about the consequences. “Even when you hit the right target, there are times when innocents pay the price. I just want people to ask, ‘Did it have to happen?’”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Panama and Canada are caught in a dispute over a copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
‘Dark woke’: what it means and how it might help DemocratsThe Explainer Respectability be damned, some Democrats are embracing crasser rhetoric
-
Book reviews: ‘American Reich: A Murder in Orange County; Neo-Nazis; and a New Age of Hate’ and ‘Winter: The Story of a Season’Feature A look at a neo-Nazi murder in California and how winter shaped a Scottish writer
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred