It’s a wintertime ritual in Washington, said Gail Russell Chaddock in The Christian Science Monitor. No, not the lighting of the White House Christmas tree. Every year, before Congress goes on its holiday break, it votes on a temporary fix of the Alternative Minimum Tax. That levy was originally imposed in 1969 to ensure that the wealthiest Americans could no longer escape paying income tax. But because the AMT has not been indexed for inflation, it now covers millions of taxpayers. The fix, or “patch,” is late this year, “because it’s caught up in a high-stakes battle” over whether the $50 billion that’s needed to pay for the yearly reprieve should be offset by tax increases. The Senate has already overwhelmingly passed legislation without the tax increases. But a vocal minority of Democrats in the House is trying to block any bill that doesn’t include offsets. Without the legislation, the AMT this year could ensnare some 22 million taxpayers, whose tax bills would jump an average $2,000. Millions more would see their tax refunds delayed, because the IRS must wait until Congress acts before programming its computers and processing returns.
This standoff didn’t need to happen, said USA Today in an editorial. “There’s an easy and equitable way to help offset the cost of this temporary patch.” Right now, the riches of managers at private-equity firms are taxed at the 15 percent capital gains rate. If those earnings were taxed as ordinary income, most of the $50 billion shortfall would be covered. But lobbyists for the private-equity industry have killed that idea. Now it appears that House Democrats “will buckle” on the “pay as you go” principle and approve an AMT patch with no funding to pay for it. “That’s your government at work.”
“Pay as you go” was always a sham anyway, said The Wall Street Journal. Democrats announced their commitment to “paygo,” as it’s called, as soon as they recaptured Congress in 2006. Ever since, they “have been using gimmick after gimmick to evade it.” The pending farm bill, for example, contains $5 billion to $10 billion in phony savings achieved by shifting subsidy payments from one year to another. “If a Fortune 500 CEO did that sort of thing, he’d be indicted.” The AMT showdown makes clear that Democrats liked “paygo” only because it gave them cover to raise taxes. Now they’ll have to abandon the cover or face the wrath of millions of taxpayers. That’s as it should be. “With the economy in a slowdown, the last thing anyone needs now is a tax hike.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Democrats’ surrender on the AMT may cost them next November, said Kevin Hassett in Bloomberg.com. It will be just the latest legislative defeat in “what has become easily the most disastrous legislative year for a majority party in memory.” The Democrats have failed to make President Bush withdraw the troops from Iraq, they have proved themselves “addicted” to pork-barrel spending, and now their divisive tactics have produced a humiliating defeat on the AMT. “The really bad news for Democrats is that voters have noticed.”
-
Weapons: Julia Garner stars in 'hyper-eerie' psychological thrillerThe Week Recommends Zach Cregger's 'top notch' new film opens with 17 children disappearing at exactly the same time
-
Freakier Friday: Lohan and Curtis reunite for 'uneven' but 'endearing' sequelThe Week Recommends Mother-and-daughter comedy returns with four characters switching bodies
-
Al fresco art: the UK's best sculpture parksThe Week Recommends Soak up the scenery with a stroll through these open-air galleries
-
Issue of the week: Yahoo’s ban on working from homefeature There’s a “painful irony” in Yahoo’s decision to make all its employees come to the office to work.
-
Issue of the week: Another big airline merger
feature The merger of American Airlines and US Airways will be the fourth between major U.S. airlines in five years.
-
Issue of the week: Feds’ fraud suit against S&P
feature The Justice Department charged S&P with defrauding investors by issuing mortgage security ratings it knew to be misleading.
-
Issue of the week: Why investors are worried about Apple
feature Some investors worry that the company lacks the “passion and innovation that made it so extraordinary for so long.”
-
Issue of the week: Does Google play fair?
feature The Federal Trade Commission cleared Google of accusations that it skews search results to its favor.
-
Issue of the week: The Fed targets unemployment
feature By making public its desire to lower unemployment, the Fed hopes to inspire investors “to behave in ways that help bring that about.”
-
Issue of the week: Is Apple coming home?
feature Apple's CEO said the company would spend $100 million next year to produce a Mac model in the U.S.
-
Issue of the week: Gunning for a hedge fund mogul
feature The feds are finally closing in on legendary hedge fund boss Steven Cohen.