Bush defends Mukasey
President Bush ratcheted up pressure on Congress to confirm Michael Mukasey as attorney general. It's "remarkable" that Democrats so quickly withdrew their support for a man with such "impeccable" credentials, said The Wall Street Jour
What happened
President Bush ratcheted up pressure on Congress to confirm Michael Mukasey as attorney general, saying that lawmakers could leave the Justice Department without leadership for the remainder of his term if they rejected the former judge. Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have threatened to block the nomination if Mukasey doesn’t state explicitly that waterboarding, a controversial interrogation technique, is illegal.
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“This is remarkable,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Not too long ago, Democrats applauded Mukasey as the “consensus choice” to lead the rattled Justice Department, and now they’re threatening to “disqualify a man of impeccable judicial temperament and credentials merely because he's willing to give U.S. interrogators the benefit of the legal doubt before he has top-secret clearance.” It looks like Mukasey has become “collateral damage” in the Democrats’ “guerrilla war” against the Bush administration’s efforts to extract information from “America’s enemies.”
Bush only has himself to blame, said The Washington Post in an editorial (free registration). It’s disturbing that Mukasey can’t bring himself to declare waterboarding—dunking a suspect to simulate drowning—illegal, but it’s really Bush’s “own warped policies on torture” that are threatening to torpedo Mukasey’s confirmation. Democrats may soon regret this fight, though, because Mukasey may be “last, best hope to see the rule of law reemerge in this administration.”
“It’s not quite torture,” said Deroy Murdock in HumanEvents.com, “but it sure has been painful” watching Democrats punish Mukasey. Waterboarding has been used to get several al Qaida masterminds—including Khalid Sheik Mohammed—to provide details about impending terror plots. Waterboarding saves lives, and causes no permanent damage. What’s “repugnant” about that?
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy