The Democrats: Wall Street’s new darlings

The Democrats: Wall Street’s new darlings

Throughout the entire 20th century, said Daniel Gross in Slate.com, the relationship between business and politics could be summed up in a simple phrase: “Businesspeople like Republicans and don’t like Democrats.” It was nothing personal; Wall Street just shared the GOP’s fondness for lower taxes, limited government, and the free market, while Democrats were the party of big government, regulation, and labor unions. For decades, business’ unwavering support meant that the Republicans always went into national campaigns with far more money. Not anymore. In this presidential election cycle, Democrats “are kicking the tar out of their rivals,’’ raising $388 million to the GOP’s $287 million. Democrats used to be the party of the have-nots. Now they’re becoming the party of the “have-mores.’’

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

If business thinks it can buy the Democrats’ favor by writing fat checks to Hillary, said Stephen Moore in The Wall Street Journal, it will soon be proved wrong. Democrats are sure to raise taxes, impose a host of onerous new workplace and environmental regulations, and give labor whatever it demands—in short, adopt an “anti-growth agenda.’’ When that happens, no Democratic donor should complain. “When you sell the rope to the hangman, you deserve to have a noose around your neck.’’ If only that were so, said Paul Krugman in The New York Times. As a progressive, I find business’ newfound enthusiasm for the Democrats troubling—but for the opposite reason. If the Democrats win in 2008, it’s entirely possible that they will have become “too dependent on lobbyists’ money to seriously confront the excesses of our new Gilded Age.”