Harrisburg, Pa.
Leaders of the intelligent design movement said in a 1999 internal “strategy” document that they hoped to overthrow the “materialistic worldview” of modern science and replace it with beliefs “consonant with Christian and theistic convictions.” The document was placed into evidence last week, in the so-called “Scopes II” trial, pitting evolution against intelligent design. Eleven parents are suing the Dover school board for requiring that students be taught intelligent design, on the grounds that it is creationism in disguise, and thus violates the separation of church and state. Defense lawyers say that intelligent design is a nonreligious scientific theory that explains gaps in the Darwinian model of evolution. Officials at the Discovery Institute, which is promoting intelligent design, said the strategy document was written merely as a fund-raising tool.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Quentin Deranque: a student’s death energizes the French far rightIN THE SPOTLIGHT Reactions to the violent killing of an ultra-conservative activist offer a glimpse at the culture wars roiling France ahead of next year’s elections.
-
Secured vs. unsecured loans: how do they differ and which is better?the explainer They are distinguished by the level of risk and the inclusion of collateral
-
‘States that set ambitious climate targets are already feeling the tension’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
