Musharraf Blamed for al Qaida’s Resurgence

Musharraf's outlook for victory in the next election is slim.

What happened

The Bush administration exerted new pressure on Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf this week to take military action against al Qaida terrorists hiding in his country, after tribal chiefs in the country's remote northwest border region renounced a 10-month-old truce and declared war on the government. Islamic militants in North Waziristan province last week mounted a series of attacks, including suicide car bombs, that killed more than 70, mostly police and soldiers.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The U.S. State Department said it sees Musharraf's truce with the militants as a disaster and now expects the Pakistanis to act decisively. 'œSome elements have to be dealt with militarily,' said Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher. But with his hold on power increasingly tenuous, Musharraf responded to the latest crisis by sending a delegation to North Waziristan's tribal leaders to try to salvage the truce.

What the editorials said

'œCuriously, Bush has lost no confidence in Musharraf,' said Investor's Business Daily. The deal with the tribal chiefs of North Waziristan was a 'œbogus peace treaty' that 'œonly worked to buy Osama bin Laden and the al Qaida leadership more time' to plot attacks against us. We can no longer sit back 'œbiting our nails,' waiting for the terror network to launch a new attack, while Musharraf fiddles. It's time to send in drones, U.S. fighter jets, and, if necessary, troops to take out al Qaida's camps.

We'd better be more strategic than that, said The Dallas Morning News. 'œThe Pakistani street is seething with anger and militancy,' and lest we forget, it is an Islamic nation with 'œnuclear bombs and middle-range missiles.' When unpopular regimes supported by the U.S. fall, they are almost always replaced by anti-American leadership. Musharraf sits atop a 'œnuclear powder keg,' and U.S. policy should be designed to slowly create more democracy in Pakistan'”not to produce an abrupt, and possibly disastrous, change of leaders.

What the columnists said

Musharraf is clearly in big trouble, said Daveed Gartenstein-Ross said in The Weekly Standard. He has acted 'œerratically and inconsistently,' cracking down last week on militants holed up the Red Mosque in Islamabad, and then trying to placate the tribal chiefs along the border. He appears to be 'œgoverning without a strategy,' both appeasing terrorists and trying to suppress them, as he frantically tries to preserve what's left of his support.

If he has any hope of continuing to rule, said Najam Sethi in The Wall Street Journal, his first step 'œis to reform the madrasas.' The number of these Islamic religious schools has doubled during Musharraf's rule. Instead of preparing young men for jobs, they train them to loathe the 'œinfidel West' and support terrorism. Pakistan's democracy-seeking middle class fears these madrasas and the extremism they spawn, but if left unchallenged, the Islamists will try to topple Musharraf and install one of their own.

That's not likely to happen, said Peter Bergen in The New Republic. The Islamists have never won more than 12 percent of the vote in Pakistan, and polls show that they would get only 5 percent in national elections now scheduled after Musharraf's term expires in November. The real threat to Musharraf's power comes from former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who enjoys widespread support among the middle class and may soon return from exile. If she does, Musharraf can either 'œassert his authority as a rigid autocrat' and rig the elections, or make a power-sharing deal with Bhutto and her supporters. Either way, his regime may be nearing its end.

What next?

Explore More