Immigration
Is ‘border security’ code for racism?
'œSome people just don't like Mexicans,' said Linda Chavez in National Review Online. Most of the radio hosts, TV pundits, politicians, and angry activists who rail against illegal immigration know better than to say it out loud, confining themselves to the reasonable-sounding argument that this is a nation of laws and that illegal immigrants, by definition, are breaking those laws. But in the anonymous safety of Internet chat rooms and columnist hate-mail, one gets a clearer sense of what this debate, 'œstripped bare,' is all about. Many Americans think 'œLatinos are dirty, diseased, indolent,' crime-prone freeloaders who have too many babies, defraud the welfare system, and are too lazy to learn English. If it's really only the illegality of illegal immigrants that bothers people, said Joe Garcia in The Arizona Republic, an easy solution is at hand. We could change the law to allow far more Mexicans and Salvadorans to immigrate legally and gain citizenship, the way millions of Italians, Irish, and Jews did in previous generations. Unless, of course, this really is about not liking 'œsomeone's skin color or non-European background.'
It's not, said Victor Davis Hanson in the Chicago Tribune. But it's easy for journalists, academics, and other white-collar elitists to throw around the words 'œracist' and 'œnativist,' since they don't have to worry that illegals earning $10 an hour will take their jobs away or depress their incomes. Nor, for the most part, do these affluent liberals live in rural and small-town 'œcommunities altered by huge influxes of illegal aliens.' Nor do their children 'œstruggle with school curricula altered to the needs of students who speak only Spanish.' But many fair-minded people do, and it isn't 'œracist' of them to fear that our country cannot assimilate millions of people pouring unchecked across the border.
We need a new way of looking at this rancorous debate, said David Brooks in The New York Times. The immigration standoff has opened a rift not between races, or between conservatives and liberals, or between blue states and red states, but between an 'œeducated class' that believes in diversity and the power of the individual and a less cosmopolitan class that believes in 'œneighborhood values.' These 'œrooted nationalists' believe it's the duty of every individual, regardless of race, to assimilate'”to adopt traditional American customs, language, and values, and fit into the larger community. It's a valid philosophy, and if smug 'œcosmopolitans' would stop accusing more traditional Americans of racism, we might have an intelligent national conversation about immigration, and work out a compromise.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Trump reportedly wants to take over US Postal Service
Speed Read President Trump is making plans to disband the leadership of USPS and absorb the agency into his administration
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The week's best photos
A moment of balance, a daring leap, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - February 21, 2025
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - sinking ship, loopholes, and more
By The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published