Miers
Can this nomination be saved?
If at first you don't succeed, said John Dickerson in Slate.com, try 'œrepackaging.' That seems to be the new White House strategy for salvaging President Bush's widely criticized nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court. Ever since he nominated her three weeks ago, Bush has tried several ways of selling Miers—all of them disastrous. When conservatives angrily protested her lack of a proven judicial philosophy, Bush responded by citing Miers' background as an evangelical Christian. But the president's blatant use of religion as a qualification only served to insult conservative intellectuals, and to inflame moderates and liberals. So this week, officials sought to turn attention away from Miers' 'œheart' and toward what they say is her 'œkeen, lean legal mind.'
That won't be an easy sell, either, said Howard Fineman and Richard Wolffe in Newsweek. 'œHarriet 2.0' stresses Miers' legal experience and her glass-ceiling-shattering leadership of a Dallas law firm and the Texas Bar Association. But since the 60-year-old Miers has written no judicial opinions or scholarly articles, pundits are now picking apart a paper trail that consists of fawning notes to Bush and pedestrian bar journal columns. Actually, said David Brooks in The New York Times, her writing 'œdoesn't even rise to the level of pedestrian.' It's incomprehensible, and riddled with 'œvapid abstractions.' Consider this typical gem from her 'œPresident's Opinion' column in the Texas Bar Journal: 'œMore and more, the intractable problems in our society have one answer: broad-based intolerance of unacceptable conditions.' Or this: 'œThere is always a necessity to tend to a myriad of responsibilities on a number of cases as well as matters not directly related to the practice of law.' Is this the work of one of the nine finest legal minds in America?
There's simply no way to salvage this nomination, said David Frum in National Review Online. In trying to persuade Bush's Christian conservative base to support an unqualified nominee, the White House has painted itself into a corner. Miers, the administration has been broadly hinting, would at least be a reliable vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. But if Miers acknowledges she's a committed pro-lifer, she'll lose pro-choice Republicans like Arlen Specter. And 'œif she disavows it, she loses conservative Republicans.' Evading the issue won't work, said John Fund in The Wall Street Journal. In a conference call between two of Miers' closest friends and Christian leaders, her friends—both of them sitting judges—said that Miers would 'œabsolutely' vote to overturn Roe. Now, the Judiciary Committee may issue subpoenas to find out whether anyone has, in fact, made such a promise. The hearings could easily 'œturn into a spectacle.'
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Matthew Scully
The New York Times
Ruth Wedgwood
The Wall Street Journal
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published