Republicans are finally talking about income inequality. But they're getting it all wrong.
The GOP has shown little fresh thinking on how to address the income gap
![Trickle-down economics?](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/anfw2WLQERadUdLstmqAnT-415-80.jpg)
Mitt Romney once said inequality was a divisive, inflammatory issue to be discussed only in "quiet rooms." Many of his fellow Republicans seemed to agree, attacking any mention of income gaps as "class warfare" or the "politics of envy." Recall the outrage on the right when Pope Francis critiqued the "trickle-down theories" of conservative economists.
But that was when the unemployment rate was a lot higher. With the economic recovery seemingly accelerating, Republicans are scrambling for relevant new ways to critique President Obama's economic performance. And some are suddenly expressing concern that the rising tide of economic growth is lifting only the yachts.
"I think inequality can be a problem, and interestingly seems to be getting a little bit worse under this administration," Rand Paul, a likely presidential candidate, recently told NPR. In a New York Times interview, former Romney running mate Paul Ryan said that while he rejected "envy economics," it is also the case that the "the wealthy are doing really well. They're practicing trickle-down economics now." And the mission statement of Jeb Bush's Right to Rise presidential super PAC concedes that "the income gap is real," while adding that only "conservative principles" can deal with it. Even Romney changed his tune, citing inequality as one reason he was thinking about a third presidential run.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Of course, Republicans have their own spin on the issue. And unsurprisingly it has little to do with the stuff Democrats prefer to talk about: the tax code, the decline of union power, the explosion of CEO pay. Which is OK, since it's debatable whether those are the major factors driving inequality.
But the GOP take shows little fresh thinking about how technology and globalization are transforming the American economy in the long term— and what novel policy responses might be required in response.
Instead, Republicans are rounding up the usual suspects. Blame "Obamanomics" for creating a historically weak recovery. Blame the Federal Reserve for bond-buying policies that supposedly boosted the stock holdings of the 1 percent and little else. As the GOP-aligned Heritage Foundation explained after Fed boss Janet Yellen gave a speech on inequality:
Ms. Yellen never mentions that Obamanomics has made inequality much worse... Her silence on this point shouldn't be too surprising because she has supported most of Obama's economic policies. She has also been a cheerleader of the Fed's easy money policies which have benefited those at the top and almost no one else... One could argue the best way to reduce inequality is to repeal everything that President Obama has done since he entered office. [Heritage]
A clever bit of political jiu-jitsu, perhaps, but weak economics. To believe the Obamanomics explanation, you also have to believe (a) that if not for the president's policies, the economy would be growing much faster, and (b) that the fruits of growth would make it to the middle class. Both suppositions are dubious. Even without Obama's policy mistakes, such as the 2013 tax hikes and the ill-designed fiscal stimulus, this recovery was likely always going to be subpar given the diabolical duo of a financial shock and a housing bust.
And faster growth doesn't do a whole lot for the 99 percent if most of those gains from growth only go to the top. That's a trend that appears to predate Obama.
Moreover, if you do think growth is the answer, then the Fed has been a friend, not a foe. The central bank's quantitative easing plan, according to Republican economist Martin Feldstein, was a "success" that stimulated growth and job creation. Or as JPMorgan economist Michael Feroli notes, "To the extent Fed policy has been stimulating economic activity...it is serving to narrow wage disparities — or at least offset other longer-run forces that have been contributing to growing wage inequality."
You know what's bad for the middle class? A never-ending recession like the one in Europe, thanks in large part to a do-nothing central bank.
So how should Republicans think and talk about inequality? The big problem with high-end inequality is not that it necessarily reduces GDP growth. Instead, it increases the impact of barriers to income mobility such as poor schools, pricey colleges, weak public transit, and onerous occupational licensing schemes. If you can't climb the ladder, then a top rung that's ever further away becomes a bigger problem. While conservatives should applaud when an entrepreneur strikes it rich thanks to an innovative new idea, product, or service, they should freely criticize crony capitalist policies that benefit the powerful and politically connected, such as special tax breaks, strong intellectual property laws, or the safety net for Wall Street banks that are "too big to fail."
When income inequality starts to hurt middle-class opportunity, it should be the concern of both parties.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
James Pethokoukis is the DeWitt Wallace Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute where he runs the AEIdeas blog. He has also written for The New York Times, National Review, Commentary, The Weekly Standard, and other places.
-
Wall Street tumbles on poor tech results
Speed Read US markets had their worst day since 2022 as Tesla and AI stocks dropped
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Salt Lake City named host of 2034 Winter Olympics
Speed Read The Winter Games are returning to the US for the first time in 32 years
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Netanyahu makes controversial address
Speed Reads Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress denounced Gaza war protestors
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published