These are the concessions Christians should make on religious freedom laws
We need to pick our battles much more wisely
I've repeatedly defended Indiana's controversial new religious freedom law, and have been a pointed critic of its opponents. (Though the opponents seem to have won a small victory; on Thursday, Indiana lawmakers seemed to back down somewhat to progressive critics who said the law would discriminate against gay people.) But I also think the current fight is, if you'll pardon the expression, a come-to-Jesus moment for Christian conservatives.
First, let's consider how this debate must sound to many people who do not share our socially conservative perspective. These liberals have fought with us — or really against us — over the legal status of same-sex relationships for more than two decades. In many cases, they were the parties to those committed same-sex relationships.
When we appeared to have the upper hand, as late as when George W. Bush was reelected in 2004, or even when the top three Democratic presidential candidates all opposed same-sex marriage in 2008, we didn't want to compromise. Now that we've lost — and I suspect the depth of that loss has only begun to dawn on Heartland religious conservatives — we're saying, "But wait, what about our freedom?"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Given what we know about human nature, we really shouldn't be surprised that our liberal opponents are unmoved.
The Christian right has always been a multifaceted political movement animated by many things, including a commitment to defending human life in its earliest stages. But broadly speaking, Christian conservatives have tried to do two things: carve out a space to exercise their own faith privately and in the public square, and uphold certain public moral standards.
Sometimes the moral crusades were launched in explicitly Christian terms, such as D. James Kennedy's Center for Reclaiming America for Christ. Other times they spoke the language of family values and airwaves decency: Concerned Women for America, the Moral Majority, Morality in Media (since changed to the National Center on Sexual Exploitation).
We've had some success on the religious liberty front, conserving an active role for faith in politics. But we've almost completely failed on the public morality front, and that failure is starting to endanger our other successes.
The actual effect of RFRA bills like Indiana's will largely be up to the courts. Individuals will always be able to make whatever claims they want, but judicial interpretations will be heavily influenced by conservative Christian organizations' litigation, especially in conservative states.
We have every right to defend our religious liberty and stay true to our beliefs about marriage. But we don't have a right to be free from everything we disagree with or that offends us. It's not even possible to have businesses that withhold service from sinners, because we are sinners ourselves. Such a standard would require having zero customers.
Conservative Christians should focus their RFRA-related resources on defending people who can reasonably be described as being compelled to participate in marriage celebrations or ceremonies contrary to their faith. We shouldn't expend any resources on behalf of the inevitable fast food restaurant manager, egged on by misleading media coverage, who refuses to serve hamburgers to a gay couple.
Jesus spent time with prostitutes, drunkards, and tax collectors. That makes it hard to argue we are called to make sure only the most righteous people we can find get a Frosty.
While we should not surrender on that which we believe, nor capitulate on religious liberty, we need to think long and hard about the tensions between the culture war and the Great Commission. Christianity is about much more than sex, but many think its teachings boil down to, "Thou shalt not be gay."
As evidenced by Nicholas Kristof's recent sympathetic column in The New York Times, many secular liberal Americans don't know that much about Christianity — especially in its more conservative forms — other than the political. This matters for much more than PR purposes, if you genuinely believe what happens in this life has eternal implications.
Conservatives in my own United Methodist Church are talking schism because of noncompliance with the denomination's teachings on marriage and homosexuality — teachings that are unlikely to be changed in the foreseeable future in the absence of a schism.
Those are important issues. But these conservatives have stayed in the church throughout its membership in the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice and while it had bishops denying the divinity of Christ.
I'm not arguing for trying to mollify unappeasable political opponents. Scripture doesn't promise Christians cultural and political preeminence wherever they happen to live, and this week is as good a time as any to remember that people have suffered more for their faith than having to miss out on the revenue generated by junkets from Connecticut.
But there is more to being true to ourselves than not baking a cake.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
'It may not be surprising that creative work is used without permission'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
5 simple items to help make your airplane seat more comfortable
The Week Recommends Gel cushions and inflatable travel pillows make a world of difference
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published