Opinion

The mommy wars are not about kids

They are about moms

The Washington Post recently reported on the first large-scale longitudinal study looking at the relationship between how much time mothers spend with their kids and how those kids turn out. They found that there is virtually no correlation for kids between the ages of 3 and 11, and only a minimal effect on adolescents. The researchers looked at how these kids fared in school, their behavior, and emotional well-being.

These findings can be read as the rejection of intensive parenting, a popular child-rearing approach rooted in the idea that the more time and effort spent on our children, the better. It's quality, not quantity, the author's of the study urge; when mothers worry about quantity, they just end up stressing out their kids too. This stress is worse for the kids than the lack of time of together.

So now that we know that both working moms and stay-at-home moms have an equal shot at raising great kids, it's time to end the mommy wars, right? Not so fast.

The findings from this study tell us that our kids can be just fine with both working and stay-at-home moms. If the mommy wars were actually about our kids, then the results would certainly be cause for a truce. But the mommy wars are not about our kids. The mommy wars are about mommies. If we want them to end we need to change the way we approach parenthood, not parenting.

I believe that most of the women engaging in the mommy wars, whether on the frontline or as bystanders, know, deep down, that their kids will be okay whether they work or not. As this recent study shows, the factors most associated with future success are income level and a mother's educational level. Those of us who are educated and financially secure, who have the time and means to pick a side in the mommy wars, we're all just squabbling over abundance. Our children have more advantages than most children throughout history, not to mention around the world today. They've got quantity and quality. They might get a little stressed out from their intense parents, but all things considered, they are going to be just fine.

The fighting carries on not because of what we think about our children, but because of what we think about ourselves. We are ambivalent about what it means to be a mother today and haven't a clue how to talk about it. We wrestle with an unprecedented number of choices, and struggle to figure out how we fit in. We speak often about wanting it all and feminist housewives, but how many of us would check either box when describing our lives?

Since we lack a vocabulary for this ambivalence, we draw lines in the sand. We're still reaching back to old identity markers, ones that have been around since the 1980s, instead of talking about work and kids in a way that reflects our lives.

These divisions are so tired and limiting. They crumble when held up to the nuance and unpredictability of our individual lives. They ignore the diversity of what it looks like and feels like to be a mother, and the fact that many of us identify with both sides at once. They also ignore more pressing concerns, like how all working mothers don't have universal parental leave and reliable, affordable child care.

Want to end the mommy wars? Yes, we've got to remember that quality matters more than quantity. But we've also got to find a way to embrace our ambivalence. Together.

We need to remember that there are many ways to define a "good parent," that kids are different, partnerships are different, and our ambitions and desires ebb and flow with the tides of our lives. And we must fight to ensure that women have the choices they deserve, even as we respect the choices they make.

More From...

Picture of Elissa StraussElissa Strauss
Read All
In defense of family dinner
If your family dinner looks nothing like this, you're not alone.
Feature

In defense of family dinner

Why being miserable in high school is good for you
The Breakfast Club
Feature

Why being miserable in high school is good for you

The end of the gushing celebrity profile
The Vogue September issue
Opinion

The end of the gushing celebrity profile

The problem with 'boyfriend' jeans
Really?
Opinion

The problem with 'boyfriend' jeans

Recommended

Report: Kevin McCarthy to meet with police officers injured on Jan. 6
Kevin McCarthy.
Jan. 6 aftermath

Report: Kevin McCarthy to meet with police officers injured on Jan. 6

Reflecting on Jan. 6, Pence tells Republicans not to 'lose faith in the Constitution'
Mike Pence.
Jan. 6 aftermath

Reflecting on Jan. 6, Pence tells Republicans not to 'lose faith in the Constitution'

Derek Chauvin set to be sentenced on Friday
Derek Chauvin.
crime and punishment

Derek Chauvin set to be sentenced on Friday

Graham says he won't be 'extorted by liberal Democrats' over infrastructure deal
Sen. Lindsey Graham.
so much for bipartisanship

Graham says he won't be 'extorted by liberal Democrats' over infrastructure deal

Most Popular

Cook called Pelosi with 'warning' about antitrust bills
Tim Cook
mr. cook calls washington

Cook called Pelosi with 'warning' about antitrust bills

7 toons about the Dems' Joe Manchin problem
Political Cartoon.
Feature

7 toons about the Dems' Joe Manchin problem

Bernie Sanders wants to know if cannabis reporter is 'stoned' right now
Bernie Sanders.
Sounds dope

Bernie Sanders wants to know if cannabis reporter is 'stoned' right now