Bernie Sanders is the climate hero America needs
Other Democrats should follow his lead


Climate politics in the Democratic Party has traditionally been defined by two things: a firm commitment among party elites that climate change is a major problem deserving serious attention, and a basic unwillingness to confront what that actually implies.
President Obama is a perfect embodiment of this contradiction. Behold his "all of the above" energy strategy. He kinda-sorta seems to get our climate peril when he's jacking up mileage requirements for new cars and pushing new EPA regulations that could potentially phase out coal power forever. But at the same time, he's selling publicly owned coal deposits at a loss and boasting about America having built enough carbon pipelines to circle the globe.
At issue is what David Roberts calls the "brutal logic" of climate change. We're not talking about a flimsy, fixable, local issue like too many plastic bags in the gutters. Climate change is a major danger to our entire society. The carbon dioxide that causes it is a fundamental byproduct of our entire industrial system — and we're not reducing our emissions anywhere close to fast enough. It would take a truly gigantic policy effort — an order of magnitude more aggressive than anything Obama has ever advocated — to achieve what most Democrats are theoretically committed to. And it probably won't get better anytime soon: Hillary Clinton, too, is reading from the watered-down Obama playbook (which is better than Republicans at least, who either deny the problem or promise to do nothing).
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, there is now a major Democratic Party figure who is actually talking about the kind of policy that could conceivably be part of a comprehensive attack on climate change: Bernie Sanders.
Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign may be quixotic in that he stands almost no chance of overpowering the Clinton Inevitability Machine. But his candidacy ought to be an extremely encouraging development for climate hawks — and could have laudable effects on the 2016 Democratic primary.
Greg Sargent has the goods, in an interview he conducted last week with Sanders. When asked to sketch his plan for a climate policy, the Vermont senator said:
It would look like a tax on carbon; a massive investment in solar, wind, geothermal; it would be making sure that every home and building in this country is properly winterized; it would be putting substantial money into rail, both passenger and cargo, so we can move towards breaking our dependency on automobiles. And it would be leading other countries around the world. [Washington Post]
Okay, it's not exactly a fully worked-out policy paper. But in the meantime, here's a more explicit program from Joe Romm drilling in on the actual details, which he summarizes as "deploy every conceivable energy-efficient and low carbon technology that we have today as fast as we can." What Sanders wants is basically a crash program of decarbonization and efficiency, coupled to a strong diplomatic effort to help China and India achieve what is also in their best interests.
Earlier in the interview, Sanders tied his policy ideas to the need to avoid catastrophic climate change in the coming decades. Politically speaking, that's absolutely crucial. Democrats generally do not speak clearly about why climate change is such an enormous problem, because it leads obviously and logically to what sound like extreme positions, and Democrats tend toward melting panic if they suspect they're five percent outside of the center-left mainstream.
One way to challenge that Democratic cowardice is the Bill McKibben way: mass organizing to change the political realities on the ground. Another way, and what Sanders is doing here, is for committed politicians to actually argue the position, and try to convince their constituents. It's hard to exaggerate what a break that is with typical Democratic hand-wringing.
The fact that Sanders is very obviously correct on the merits may present a serious challenge to Hillary Clinton — not electorally, but ideologically. Pretending like climate change is some minor boutique issue is one thing when nobody disagrees, but it's something else when a political opponent outlines a clear and logical explanation for why that is insufficient, buttressed by the best and most comprehensive scientific products ever produced.
Sometimes in politics, simply stating the bleeding obvious counts as a major virtue.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Book reviews: ‘Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America’ and ‘How to End a Story: Collected Diaries, 1978–1998’
Feature A political ‘witch hunt’ and Helen Garner’s journal entries
By The Week US Published
-
The backlash against ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli filter
The Explainer The studio's charming style has become part of a nebulous social media trend
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Why are student loan borrowers falling behind on payments?
Today's Big Question Delinquencies surge as the Trump administration upends the program
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published