Why FilmStruck is the future of streaming
You will never watch every movie — so why are you letting a robot decide which ones to stream?
Just how many movies are there?
Back in 2012, during what were still the early days of Netflix Instant, HTMLGiant sought to answer the question. Its conclusion, after a long and winding digression about how one might even define a movie, basically confirmed that "there are infinite movies." Because that isn't very satisfying, it also offered a number, from Internet Movie Database's list, which puts the official count of "feature" films in the world today as 358,569.
But, as HTMLGiant pointed out in an important caveat, that probably leaves out most international movies. "For instance, during the 1960s, over 300 films were produced in Cambodia alone, and none of them seem represented here."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In other words, you will never watch all the movies. You will never even come remotely close.
But before the rise of Netflix and Hulu and Amazon Prime, this infinity might not have felt so overwhelming. Sure, there were shelves and shelves of movies in Blockbusters and Hollywood Videos, but even stores have four walls — the movies were contained. With the advent of streaming, access to films from around the world was suddenly blown open. Lists of the "best 638 new movies added to Netflix!" fill culture websites, and you can store all these movies in queues and watch lists with the idle click of a button, where the titles then sit under a layer of digital dust until you finally find the time to get around to them.
It doesn't have to be this way, though. A new streaming service is aiming to change the way we watch movies at home entirely.
FilmStruck represents a new joint venture between the TV channel Turner Classic Movies and the niche distributor Criterion Collection. The service sets itself apart from the other mega-streaming subscriptions in that it isn't designed for the once-or-twice-a-month movie watcher. Instead, it is a cinephilic paradise of "art house, indie, foreign, and cult films." Pricing for a stripped-down version starts at $6.99 a month, with access to the Criterion Collection library bumping that up to $10.99 a month, or $99 a year.
FilmStruck claims it will include over 1,100 films, many in languages other than English — but still, admittedly, an itty-bitty fraction of all those that exist in the world. Yet the service isn't intended to offer access to every movie in the universe; rather, its selling point is its curation and careful discrimination of titles that don't belong in its particular art-house/classic/foreign film aesthetic (look elsewhere for Ironman, basically). To give you a better idea, the only film from 2016 on FilmStruck is a short that was shot to compliment Black Moon (1975), while its oldest film is a 1914 Charlie Chaplin short. Additionally, FilmStruck offers exclusive special features that supplement the movies and programs in its collection.
And although complex algorithms offered by other streaming services whir to produce a list of "female-fronted road movies," or the like, because you watched Thelma & Louise once, FilmStruck most notably assembles its programming using real, actual film buffs on staff.
Relying on the human brain to recommend movies might seem counterintuitive as technology moves further and further toward artificial intelligence and algorithmic realms. But if you are a moviegoer lucky enough to live in a city that still has a major repertory film scene, you likely already rely on art-house theaters and local critics to direct you toward movies that are worth your time. FilmStruck is trying to replicate the same experience online.
The website is built out of critic assembled "series," such as this one on films that were once banned in the United States. A similar series, on the Hollywood blacklist, could be seen at New York's Anthology Film Archives last summer. Or take the Akira Kurosawa series featured prominently on FilmStruck's homepage; the American Cinematheque at the Egyptian Theatre in Los Angeles held its own retrospective of the influential Japanese director last winter. Other examples on Filmstruck include the "Native People, Native Lands" bundle, "Early Kubrick" and "Serious Woody Allen," and "Remade in America," featuring films that were "the original source material for several famous American remakes," like Chus Gutiérrez's 1997 film Insomnia, later remade by Christopher Nolan with Al Pacino and Robin Williams. Such esoterica would feel right at home at New York's Film Forum.
All the pages on the website are also addictively browse-able, with a Criterion Collection-like eye for original art and design.
In many ways, FilmStruck's model is similar to that of Mubi, my personal favorite streaming service. Mubi posts a film a day, each of which is only available for a month. It maximizes its reliance on human curation by only releasing movies one at a time and giving viewers a short timeframe to actually watch the film. Instead of squirreling away movies I might one day get around to rediscovering in a lost corner of Netflix, I actively try to get back to Mubi to keep up with what it's posting.
While FilmStruck doesn't have a ticking clock, its specially curated sections do have a binge-able quality to them — I want to watch every single movie listed in "How to Murder Your Spouse," for example. It is this particular quality about FilmStruck that might help it compete with a surplus of streaming services that still don't have the attention, or monetary incentive, to put effort into making classic films available. (Online access to the Criterion Collection is a notable exception; it was originally housed at Hulu before it was yanked for FilmStruck. Hardcore film buffs also have Fandor as another good option).
But even with these resources at our fingertips, it has been pointed out that many people simply don't have interest in classic movies anymore. "This is the great paradox of classic film in the age of streaming," Vox writes. "If you already know you're a film history buff, it's never been easier to devour title after title, either on demand or on Blu-ray or on specialty cable channels and streaming services. But the gap between 'casual film fan' and 'film history buff' has never been harder — or more expensive — to bridge."
And as Turner Classic Movies general manager Jennifer Dorian explained: "Every single person says, 'Oh, I started watching [classic films] with my older brother.' 'I started watching it with my grandma.' 'I started watching it with my dad.' It's almost always a learned affiliation. Classic film is taught, a lot of times, from generation to generation."
FilmStruck wants to teach. That's where its supplements come in — some, like the one-minute clip bundled with the "Starring Paul Robeson" series, run like a kind of trailer while other bundles have goodies exclusive to Criterion, such as Blood Simple's storyboards and behind-the-scenes clips:
You are never going to watch every movie. You probably won't even watch every film in your Netflix queue, if you're anything like me. But for the short time we are alive to experience these plays of light and shadow, we might as well challenge ourselves, broaden our worlds, and discover something new.
That, at least, is the gamble FilmStruck is willing to take. And if it pays off, the future of movies is bright indeed.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeva Lange was the executive editor at TheWeek.com. She formerly served as The Week's deputy editor and culture critic. She is also a contributor to Screen Slate, and her writing has appeared in The New York Daily News, The Awl, Vice, and Gothamist, among other publications. Jeva lives in New York City. Follow her on Twitter.
-
The real story behind the Stanford Prison Experiment
The Explainer 'Everything you think you know is wrong' about Philip Zimbardo's infamous prison simulation
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
Is it safe for refugees to return to Syria?
Talking Point European countries rapidly froze asylum claims after Assad's fall but Syrian refugees may have reason not to rush home
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 14 - 20 December
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Walter Isaacson's 'Elon Musk' can 'scarcely contain its subject'
The latest biography on the elusive tech mogul is causing a stir among critics
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Welcome to the new TheWeek.com!
The Explainer Please allow us to reintroduce ourselves
By Jeva Lange Published
-
The Oscars finale was a heartless disaster
The Explainer A calculated attempt at emotional manipulation goes very wrong
By Jeva Lange Last updated
-
Most awkward awards show ever?
The Explainer The best, worst, and most shocking moments from a chaotic Golden Globes
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
The possible silver lining to the Warner Bros. deal
The Explainer Could what's terrible for theaters be good for creators?
By Jeva Lange Last updated
-
Jeffrey Wright is the new 'narrator voice'
The Explainer Move over, Sam Elliott and Morgan Freeman
By Jeva Lange Published
-
This week's literary events are the biggest award shows of 2020
feature So long, Oscar. Hello, Booker.
By Jeva Lange Published
-
What She Dies Tomorrow can teach us about our unshakable obsession with mortality
The Explainer This film isn't about the pandemic. But it can help viewers confront their fears about death.
By Jeva Lange Published