How to force Donald Trump voters away from the dark side
Give them what they need, not what they want


Donald Trump voters have gotten an unusual amount of attention this election. On one level, it's to be expected, because Trump is such a bizarre candidate. But given his bigotry and incompetence, one sadly popular approach has been to treat his supporters like charity cases. For example, this recent Washington Post article called for more "empathy" for Trump voters — and it quickly created a deluge of snarking from liberals irritated at racists being treated with kid gloves.
This is a shame. Because while Trump supporters are very good at drawing media attention, journalists often miss the forest for the trees. Few have earnestly paid attention to Trump voters' needs — not what they say they want, but what they actually need. Namely, to be stripped of racist attitudes.
What do I mean?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
First, I think it's important to make a distinction between sympathy, defined as earnest fellow feeling for someone else; and empathy, defined as an attempt to understand another person in detail, regardless of their moral character.
To understand sympathy, you should read this profile of a number of working-class black Americans transfixed with horror over the election. The palpable and entirely rational fear they have of a Trump presidency is simply heartbreaking. Their motives are also extremely obvious, which probably is part of the reason they have gotten less attention from the press. Like any demographic who is being systematically disenfranchised by one party, they are naturally ironclad devotees of the other party, despite the fact that they don't have all that much in the way of positive benefits to show for it over the last 20 years.
Contrast that idea with Robert McNamara's notion of empathy. In the documentary The Fog of War, he describes how the diplomat Tommy Thompson helped defuse the Cuban missile crisis. Thompson had actually lived with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev for some time. When the Kennedy administration got two cables during the crisis, one diplomatic and one aggressive, Thompson advised Kennedy to respond to the softer message, predicting that Khrushchev would accept it — and he was right.
McNamara concludes that this sort of empathy is crucial to wise dealings with an enemy: "We must try to put ourselves inside their skin, and look at us through their eyes, just to understand the thoughts that lie behind their decisions and their actions." If you believe, as I do, that Trumpism is a dangerous development in American politics, this sort of empathy is extremely important, in a coldly tactical sense at the very least.
So what to do? Many liberals argue that racism is basically racists' primary motivator. In other words, it's not just the means with which they're conned into supporting conservative policy that undermines the fortunes of both black people and themselves, it's "a sensible, if deeply immoral, choice," to quote Ta-Nehisi Coates.
There is something to this. But I don't think it's the end of the story — because, for one, racism can cause actual physical harm to its adherents. For instance, racism-fueled politics is a big reason why the American welfare state is so weak, which is in turn a big reason why poor white life expectancy is declining.
Physical health aside, one can also argue that racist beliefs are a sort of mental disease — indeed, some even argue that it's possible to sympathize with white racists because of this. James Baldwin, in the process of wiping the floor with William F. Buckley in a debate, once articulated this perspective. Speaking of lower-class white Southerners, he said:
They have been raised to believe, and by now they helplessly believe, that no matter how terrible their lives may be — and their lives have been quite terrible — and no matter how far they fall, no matter what disaster overtakes them, they have one enormous knowledge and consolation, which is like a heavenly revelation: At least they are not black. Now I suggest that of all the terrible things that can happen to a human being that is one of the worst. I suggest that what has happened to white southerners is in some ways after all much worse than what has happened to Negroes there.Because — Sheriff Clark in Selma, Alabama … no one can be dismissed as a total monster. I'm sure he loves his wife and children … he is visibly a man like me. But he doesn't know what drives him to use the club, to menace with the gun, and to use the cattle prod. Something awful must have happened to a human being to be able to put a cattle prod against a woman's breast, for example … Alabama sheriffs and poor Alabama ladies, white ladies, their moral lives have been destroyed by the plague called color. [James Baldwin]
If racism is an immutable fact of life, there is basically nothing to be done about Trumpism besides hoping the Obama coalition continues to provide national victories. But I believe it is possible to erode racist attitudes over time, and that a major factor fueling the open bigotry of Trump is the lousy economic performance of the Obama years.
One major future task, therefore, for the Democratic coalition is forcing white racists onto a higher moral plane whether they like it or not, with the stick of federal laws and social shaming on one hand and the carrot of full employment, mass unionization, and social democracy on the other.
I believe that they — or perhaps their children — will grudgingly appreciate it in the end.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Gandhi arrests: Narendra Modi's 'vendetta' against India's opposition
The Explainer Another episode threatens to spark uproar in the Indian PM's long-running battle against the country's first family
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
How the woke right gained power in the US
Under the radar The term has grown in prominence since Donald Trump returned to the White House
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK
-
Codeword: April 24, 2025
The Week's daily codeword puzzle
By The Week Staff
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK