Way back in October 2015, John Boehner gave Paul Ryan a wonderful gift. Boehner, who had announced his resignation as House speaker under threat of eviction by his own Republican majority, wanted to make sure that Ryan, his successor, started his own tenure as smoothly as possible. To grease the skids for Ryan, Boehner worked out a budget agreement with the Obama White House to modestly increase spending and push off the next debt-limit increase until 2017.

At the time, hardline conservatives in the House wanted to hold the debt limit hostage in order to squeeze the White House into accepting spending cuts, which threatened to trigger a default on interest payments for the government's debts. Boehner's own speakership had been crippled by intraparty political fights over these issues, so with one foot out the door he cut a deal with the Democrats to make sure this potential crisis was cleared from Ryan's immediate path.

Because D.C. is a terminally stupid place that is powered by ridiculous acts of political theater, Ryan responded to Boehner's magnanimity by attacking the outgoing speaker and saying nasty things about the budget deal (while also making it clear that the deal would pass). Promising a break with the Boehner era, Ryan said that the debt limit would be dealt with differently the next time. "Under new management, we are not going to do the people's business this way," he said. "As a conference we should have been meeting months ago to discuss these things, to have a unified strategy going forward."

Well, guess what? The time Boehner bought for Ryan has just about run out, and Ryan — promises to have a "unified strategy" notwithstanding — is about to blunder into another debt-limit crisis just like his predecessor did.

The obstacle facing Paul Ryan in 2017 is the same one Boehner struggled to surmount: Conservatives in the party want to leverage the threat of debt default to force passage of their own legislative priorities. As The Huffington Post's Matt Fuller reports, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus is looking to use the debt-limit fight to massively cut spending, or pass an ObamaCare repeal, or enact some other pie-in-the-sky proposal that will never overcome a filibuster from Democrats in the Senate.

Meanwhile, the rest of the GOP can't seem to agree on the best course of action — Trump administration officials have said they want to just raise the debt limit with no strings attached, while Republicans in the Senate are conflicted and unclear as to what they want to do. The utter lack of cohesion among the party controlling the legislature is worrisome given that Congress is bumping up against a hard deadline and risks kicking the legs out from underneath the economy with a needless, self-inflicted debt default.

This dynamic puts Ryan and the GOP in a perilous situation, along with the country at large. In keeping with the longstanding dysfunction within Republican politics, the simplest answer to this looming crisis — enlisting Democrats to increase the debt limit with no other policy riders — will meet the stiffest resistance from within the party. Should Ryan and the rest of the leadership opt for this strategy they'll help avert an economic implosion, but they'll also face a brewing mutiny among the party's hard-right faction, which will complain that conservative principles are once again being forsaken.

This situation is dangerous for Ryan in particular, given that Boehner's fate as speaker was ultimately sealed when the hardliners turned on him for abandoning their principles. Ryan's legislative record thus far is unimpressive, even though Republicans control Congress and the White House. The speaker burned through valuable time and political capital to drag the wheezing pre-corpse of the American Health Care Act over the finish line, only to see the whole legislative push collapse in the Senate. He's talking a big game with regard to tax reform, but no one seems to know what Ryan has in mind or how he can get it passed.

If Ryan goes ahead and passes a "clean" debt-limit hike after wasting almost an entire year with no major legislative accomplishments, the same lawmakers who conspired to oust Boehner would understandably start to wonder what, exactly, has changed.

The only solace Ryan might be able to take is that this same problem would afflict anyone who suffered the misfortune of leading today's Republican Party. Leadership in government will ultimately require some level of compromise, and that inescapable reality is unacceptable to an extreme faction of the party that demands ideological rigidity even when the basic functions of government are put at risk.