Republicans are acting like Trump's guilty
The implicit assumption behind every attack on the Russia investigation? He did it.
If I asked, could you explain what exactly President Trump did wrong in regard to Russia's effort to help him win the 2016 election? Almost certainly not, which illustrates the fact that while the special counsel's investigation is working its way toward the Oval Office, it hasn't gotten there yet.
But here's what's odd: While the president's allies in Congress and the media don't know what he did wrong either (if anything), they sure are acting like he's guilty of something.
While we've already learned about a lot of contacts between certain colorful Russians and high-ranking members of the Trump campaign — Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Donald Trump Jr. — the degree of the president's involvement remains a mystery. Other than reports that Trump dictated the laughably dishonest statement about the meeting a number of those advisers had with a group of Russians offering dirt on Hillary Clinton, we don't know much about what he did, let alone what he ordered.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
While some Republicans are trying to remain calm, to watch conservative media figures or hard-right Republican members of Congress, you'd think they all knew that if they don't man the barricades their leader could wind up behind bars or be impeached. There's an all-out war against Robert Mueller's investigation underway; Fox News has now begun referring to it as a "coup," amidst the network's unceasing coverage of the supposed "corruption" it represents. If Trump's allies thought the facts would prove the president's innocence and that of everyone else involved, they wouldn't be in such a panic. But as it is, it sounds as if they're sure this is an existential threat to the Trump presidency.
That's an assumption about Trump's guilt, because the really monumental scandals (Watergate, Iran-Contra, Lewinsky) are the ones that involve wrongdoing on the part of the president himself, not just his underlings. I'd guess that they're probably right in assuming Trump is guilty of something, but we don't know for sure, not yet anyway.
But there's one Republican who's convinced Trump will be fully exonerated: Donald Trump.
CNN reports that "Trump is boasting to friends and advisers that he expects Mueller to clear him of wrongdoing in the coming weeks." That opinion is apparently based on the assurances of his legal team, who haven't exactly shown themselves to be a bunch of geniuses so far. It's clearly false, since each week brings news of someone Mueller has flipped or a new avenue the investigation is pursuing; most knowledgeable observers think there's a long way to go. On the other hand, promising Trump that he's in the clear and it all will be wrapped up soon could be a clever way of keeping him from sabotaging himself with attacks on Mueller.
The latest twist, however, is one that could bring the scandal to an entirely new level. Over the weekend we learned that Mueller's team has obtained thousands of emails written by members of Trump's presidential transition team, which included pretty much every major player involved in this affair. Trump's lawyers were apparently caught completely by surprise, and were left complaining that Mueller shouldn't have been allowed to get the emails from the General Services Administration, which runs government operations, making absurd claims that the emails are privileged and private.
But as a number of experts have pointed out, those emails were written to and from .gov accounts and housed on government servers, with no expectation of privacy. And let's pause to appreciate the irony of Republicans complaining that the Trump team's government emails should be private, when they spent a couple of years screaming that every email Hillary Clinton ever sent should be revealed and are now insisting that the private text messages of FBI agents working for Robert Mueller should be scrutinized to see if they have any anti-Trump leanings.
It would certainly be a poetic turn if what finally lifted the curtain on this scandal was a bunch of emails that Trump's associates were too dumb to realize might one day be visible to the public. Now I suppose it's possible that those emails will reveal nothing more than a group of people acting with nothing but the highest degree of professionalism and integrity. But from what we know about the people Donald Trump gathered around him, how likely is that?
Not too likely. In fact, I'd be surprised if the content of those emails didn't embody all the breathtaking naïvete, ill-earned hubris, and outright stupidity we've come to expect from the knuckleheads in Trump's employ (and in his family). Perhaps none of them were dumb enough to incriminate themselves in emails, but I doubt it. As Mueller's spokesperson said in response to the White House's assertion that the GSA shouldn't have given Mueller the emails, "When we have obtained emails in the course of our ongoing criminal investigation, we have secured either the account owner's consent or appropriate criminal process." The repetition of the word "criminal" should send shivers down a few people's spines.
No matter how bad this scandal gets, President Trump will always have a powerful media apparatus supporting him and working to discredit the investigation and its conclusions, as well as allies in Congress who will not abandon him no matter what gets revealed. We could see a video of him kneeling before Vladimir Putin and pledging his eternal loyalty to the Kremlin before biting the head off a bald eagle, and he would still retain a core of supporters willing to go to any length to defend him.
They don't yet know what those lengths are, but given what they've already said, you can tell they think it's going to be a long journey.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Four key tax changes to prepare for in April
The Explainer With time running out, a last-minute checklist could help you make the most of your allowances
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Covid four years on: have we got over the pandemic?
Today's Big Question Brits suffering from both lockdown nostalgia and collective trauma that refuses to go away
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Katespiracy: is the media to blame?
Talking Point Public statement about cancer diagnosis followed weeks of wild speculation and conspiracy theories
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published