The Democrats' futile attacks on Trump's sex life
Why investigating Trump's reported extramarital affairs will only hurt the Democrats
Democrats have decided their best shot at bringing President Trump down is to focus on his sex life.
Yes, they really are that dumb.
The Washington Post on Monday reported that congressional Democrats are planning "a major investigative focus" on Trump's alleged pre-presidential affairs, having decided that the public evidence he paid two women hush money during the 2016 campaign makes the matter easy pickings for their investigators.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"The fingerprints are all over this one — it's not like a big mystery," said Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Md.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee.
Democrats are right to reach for low-hanging fruit — Al Capone didn't go to prison for rum-running, after all, but for tax evasion. And Trump really does appear to have committed an election law crime by orchestrating payments to these women — one hesitates to call them "former lovers" — and he, like his disgraced former lawyer Michael Cohen, should pay a penalty for doing so.
That said, it's possible Democrats have chosen the dumbest possible route to removing the president from office.
Here are at least three better reasons to impeach Trump:
The galling truth is that Democrats have tiptoed around the idea of impeachment for more than two years because they feared repeating the GOP disaster of the late 1990s, when that party was punished by voters after impeaching Bill Clinton over his sex life. Now, they've decided to take the path they said they most feared. This does not make sense.
For one thing, it's arguable that Trump's sex life has already been litigated by voters. He was a known philanderer in November 2016 — he'd made a career, in part, by bragging to the New York Post and Howard Stern about it — and a sufficient number of voters decided that didn't matter enough to keep him out of office. That stinks, but it's true. And Democrats have spent a generation laying the groundwork for this effort to fail, by complaining for 20 years about the frivolousness of the GOP's 1990s impeachment effort.
It's easy to understand why Democrats would choose this route. Sex is easy. Sex commands headlines. Who wants to explain to the public the ins-and-outs of, say, the Emoluments Clause? And it's true that Trump's behavior in the matter was shady and, based on the fact his lawyer is now sitting in prison for it, very likely illegal. But we've seen this movie before. Democrats were always going to have a tough time "winning" impeachment, thanks to GOP control of the Senate. It appears they're choosing the worst possible path — one that leaves Trump in office while diminishing their own standing with the public. That is not noble. It is just dumb.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
The art world and motherhood: the end of a final taboo?
Talking Point Hettie Judah's new touring exhibition offers a 'riveting riposte' to old cliches
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
'Musk's reliance on China draws rising scrutiny'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Biba: the story of a 'legendary emporium'
The Week Recommends Brand's 60th anniversary is being marked with retrospective celebrating the 'iconic shop's cultural importance'
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published