The paradox of impeachment
Congress' attempts to protect the Constitution from the president may drastically increase the threat he poses to it
The impeachment of President Trump is both necessary and, possibly, a disaster in the making.
For a lesson in how both of these things can be true at once, let's look at this series of tweets the president fired off over the weekend:
There is so much wrong and frightening in these tweets, but let us focus on the most alarming idea: that congressional oversight of the president amounts to an act of treason, and that holding Trump accountable for his official actions is a crime punishable by death. This is not a one-off: Trump has frequently floated the idea that investigations of his conduct are treasonous. Just last week he suggested that the still-anonymous whistleblower who triggered the impeachment drive against him should be executed. (CBS reported Sunday the whistleblower is now under federal protection.) A key theme of Trump's entire presidency, in fact, has been the effort to declare "illegal" many of the quite-legal methods used to keep him in bounds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
He is the president of the United States. He consistently makes such pronouncements. We must take his words and ideas seriously.
Doing so results in a paradox. First, it makes his impeachment a pressing requirement — Trump's ignorance of and contempt for the Constitution as a document that in any way restrains his behavior is a fundamental violation of his oath of office. Second, it forebodes that the impeachment process could be a disaster, with the president making every effort to destroy the people and institutions holding him to account. In other words, Congress' attempts to protect the Constitution from the president may drastically increase the threat he poses to it.
It is a hellish Catch-22. But it cannot be avoided.
There are, of course, many voices urging House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to turn back. In the week since the impeachment inquiry was announced, it has become almost conventional wisdom that Trump should be investigated and removed from office — but that the effort to do so might actually entrench him in the White House and, at the very least, produce an electoral setback for Democrats.
"Yes, Trump is guilty, but impeachment is a mistake," New York Times columnist David Brooks opined last week.
"If this is the risk Pelosi wants to take with swing voters," commented Brooks' colleague, Bret Stephens, "Republicans will be happy to let her take it."
They join any number of pundits who also argue that Democrats will pay a huge price for their impeachment efforts. It is a frustrating notion, akin to calling 911 and telling the dispatcher your house is ablaze, but you'd prefer firefighters stay away, lest they make things worse.
Unfortunately, the pundits might be right. But Democrats should proceed anyway.
Impeachment, as experts have pointed out forever, is a political act. But it isn't just a political act. Impeachment is the method by which Congress can sweep aside corruption in favor of justice. To abandon that constitutional tool just because the president threatens a tantrum is to abandon the very idea of America — and its government — as a beacon for the rule of law. It means we are ruled by a vandal.
If that is the case — if America's commitment to good, fair, and honest governance has become so hollow and untrustworthy that it must surrender to the president's temper just to pretend to survive — then it is time to find out. The information we have so far overwhelmingly suggests Trump welcomed foreign interference to gain office, has then used the office to enrich himself, and now stands accused of using the power of that office to attempt to punish and undermine political rivals. It might be convenient for Democrats to ignore all of that, but it wouldn't be right.
There are reasons for hope. Republicans might stick by Trump's side no matter what, but the latest polls show that a majority of Americans favor the impeachment inquiry. It is, however, early in the process. Predicting the end of the ride is a fool's game. It may be the case that critics are ultimately correct. Maybe impeachment will be a disaster.
But the alternative — accepting that we are a nation that allows naked corruption to reign, a nation where we even applaud that corruption and call it virtue — is worse. Trump represents the worst that America has to offer. Impeachment is the surest way to discover if America can still summon its best self.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Today's political cartoons - November 23, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - qualifications, tax cuts, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Long summer days in Iceland's highlands
The Week Recommends While many parts of this volcanic island are barren, there is a 'desolate beauty' to be found in every corner
By The Week UK Published
-
The Democrats: time for wholesale reform?
Talking Point In the 'wreckage' of the election, the party must decide how to rebuild
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published