The GOP will follow Trump anywhere — except out of a foreign war
Suddenly Republican leaders have found their spines
![President Trump.](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VKugvr2bAj2iwjBb9Uq69c-415-80.jpg)
Maybe Republican elites aren't completely in President Trump's pocket after all.
Yes, they'll give him a pass for equivocating on racism or even stirring up racist grievances. They'll go against long-held free-market principles and let the president conduct his trade wars with little interference. They'll look the other way while his administration separates migrant families at the border, undermines the free press, and violates the most basic constitutional principles. They'll play dumb when he asks foreign countries to interfere in American elections. Hell, they'll even let him insult and defame their families and still they'll work tirelessly to prove their loyalty to him.
Try to pull the United States out of a foreign war, though, and GOP leaders find their spines.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It happened again Monday. On Sunday night, the White House announced that American forces were being withdrawn from northern Syria to make way for a Turkish invasion of the region that would presumably target the same Kurdish forces who have assisted the United States in its fight against ISIS forces in the Middle East.
Suddenly, there was no shortage of Republican criticism for Trump. Fox & Friends' Brian Kilmeade grumbled that the decision was a "disaster." Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), often an ostentatious lapdog for the president, said Trump's decision was "shortsighted and irresponsible." Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who normally finesses his disagreements with the president, offered a sideways rebuke. "American interests," McConnell said, "are best served by American leadership, not by retreat or withdrawal."
It's true that Trump's announcement was — in keeping with his character — a total mess. Some reports suggested he made the announcement without giving national security officials a proper heads-up. And he seemed to blow past the possible moral and strategic ramifications of leaving the Kurds to the mercy of the Turkish armed forces. Trump only compounded the error with an afternoon tweet boasting of his "great and unmatched wisdom" on the issue. This president has a habit of doing everything in the worst way possible.
But it's also true that the Washington establishment — and Republican leaders in particular — has never met a foreign war it wasn't willing to extend in perpetuity. Indeed, Monday marked the 18th anniversary of America's war in Afghanistan — the soldiers fighting there now were babies, at best, when the conflict started.
It's troubling enough, as my colleague Damon Linker writes, that national security hawks are "always expanding American commitments abroad, never pulling them back, and never even prioritizing among them." That tendency becomes positively offensive, though, when you realize that the normally feckless GOP is only brave enough to stand against its leader when he seeks to fight just a little bit less. War is the one conservative principle that conservative elites won't abandon, no matter what.
The last time Trump encountered this much opposition from his own party was in December, when he again tried to announce a withdrawal of American forces from Syria. Defense Secretary James Mattis resigned in protest. Graham went to the Senate floor to criticize the president. Republican senators yelled their heads off. Eventually, Trump backed down.
"The job of the Congress is to hold the executive branch accountable," Graham said in a meeting with Vice President Mike Pence. "He's the commander in chief, but he needs to be held accountable for his decisions. And I want hearings as soon as possible."
Those are words you'll hear from Graham in almost no other context.
Observers have spent the last few years trying to understand why Republican leaders seem so unwilling to abandon Trump, who would clearly throw them under the bus if it afforded him the slightest advantage. Some have proposed the issue is transactional — that as long as Trump gives conservatives tax cuts and judges, they'll tolerate his other shenanigans. Others, myself included, believe that GOP elected officials think they must align themselves with the president in order to keep their jobs.
There is probably a little truth in each explanation. But GOP officials on Monday proved that they're willing to risk it all — the tax cuts, the judges, their jobs — in the name of continuing America's "forever wars" over Trump's opposition. Republican elites are willing to let Trump get away with just about anything — so long as he doesn't start bringing American troops home.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Today's political cartoons - September 7, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - football widows, meddling kids, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Smoking ban: the return of the nanny state?
Talking Point Starmer's plan to revive Sunak-era war on tobacco has struck an unsettling chord even with some non-smokers
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: September 7, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published