The GOP will follow Trump anywhere — except out of a foreign war
Suddenly Republican leaders have found their spines
Maybe Republican elites aren't completely in President Trump's pocket after all.
Yes, they'll give him a pass for equivocating on racism or even stirring up racist grievances. They'll go against long-held free-market principles and let the president conduct his trade wars with little interference. They'll look the other way while his administration separates migrant families at the border, undermines the free press, and violates the most basic constitutional principles. They'll play dumb when he asks foreign countries to interfere in American elections. Hell, they'll even let him insult and defame their families and still they'll work tirelessly to prove their loyalty to him.
Try to pull the United States out of a foreign war, though, and GOP leaders find their spines.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It happened again Monday. On Sunday night, the White House announced that American forces were being withdrawn from northern Syria to make way for a Turkish invasion of the region that would presumably target the same Kurdish forces who have assisted the United States in its fight against ISIS forces in the Middle East.
Suddenly, there was no shortage of Republican criticism for Trump. Fox & Friends' Brian Kilmeade grumbled that the decision was a "disaster." Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), often an ostentatious lapdog for the president, said Trump's decision was "shortsighted and irresponsible." Even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who normally finesses his disagreements with the president, offered a sideways rebuke. "American interests," McConnell said, "are best served by American leadership, not by retreat or withdrawal."
It's true that Trump's announcement was — in keeping with his character — a total mess. Some reports suggested he made the announcement without giving national security officials a proper heads-up. And he seemed to blow past the possible moral and strategic ramifications of leaving the Kurds to the mercy of the Turkish armed forces. Trump only compounded the error with an afternoon tweet boasting of his "great and unmatched wisdom" on the issue. This president has a habit of doing everything in the worst way possible.
But it's also true that the Washington establishment — and Republican leaders in particular — has never met a foreign war it wasn't willing to extend in perpetuity. Indeed, Monday marked the 18th anniversary of America's war in Afghanistan — the soldiers fighting there now were babies, at best, when the conflict started.
It's troubling enough, as my colleague Damon Linker writes, that national security hawks are "always expanding American commitments abroad, never pulling them back, and never even prioritizing among them." That tendency becomes positively offensive, though, when you realize that the normally feckless GOP is only brave enough to stand against its leader when he seeks to fight just a little bit less. War is the one conservative principle that conservative elites won't abandon, no matter what.
The last time Trump encountered this much opposition from his own party was in December, when he again tried to announce a withdrawal of American forces from Syria. Defense Secretary James Mattis resigned in protest. Graham went to the Senate floor to criticize the president. Republican senators yelled their heads off. Eventually, Trump backed down.
"The job of the Congress is to hold the executive branch accountable," Graham said in a meeting with Vice President Mike Pence. "He's the commander in chief, but he needs to be held accountable for his decisions. And I want hearings as soon as possible."
Those are words you'll hear from Graham in almost no other context.
Observers have spent the last few years trying to understand why Republican leaders seem so unwilling to abandon Trump, who would clearly throw them under the bus if it afforded him the slightest advantage. Some have proposed the issue is transactional — that as long as Trump gives conservatives tax cuts and judges, they'll tolerate his other shenanigans. Others, myself included, believe that GOP elected officials think they must align themselves with the president in order to keep their jobs.
There is probably a little truth in each explanation. But GOP officials on Monday proved that they're willing to risk it all — the tax cuts, the judges, their jobs — in the name of continuing America's "forever wars" over Trump's opposition. Republican elites are willing to let Trump get away with just about anything — so long as he doesn't start bringing American troops home.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
The Week contest: Swift stimulus
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'It's hard to resist a sweet deal on a good car'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
10 concert tours to see this winter
The Week Recommends Keep warm traveling the United States — and the world — to see these concerts
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published