Trump's last-ditch effort to distract voters from his record
Look over here! It's Trump vs. Lesley Stahl!
In January 1988, facing a tough primary fight in his campaign for president, then-Vice President George H.W. Bush went on the CBS Evening News and started a fight with anchor Dan Rather.
Bush wasn't just running for president — he was coming off the Iran-Contra scandal, in which the United States had illegally given arms to the Iranian government in exchange for the release of American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah. There were still questions swirling about Bush's involvement in the affair, so naturally, Rather brought up the topic.
Bush wasn't having it.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"I don't think it's fair to judge a whole career, it's not fair to judge my whole career by a rehash on Iran," he told Rather, angrily — and then brought up an embarrassing incident in the anchor's recent past. "How would you like it if I judged your career by those seven minutes you walked off the set in New York? Would you like that?"
Rather kept pressing on with his questions, but the encounter immediately became more infamous for the interview's combative tone than for any revelations it produced. The vice president, who had been plagued by criticism of his manliness, spent the next few days taking a victory lap — at one point even making a vulgar reference to CBS reporter Leslie Stahl — and many observers agreed the incident helped give Bush a boost on his way to claiming both the GOP nomination and the presidency that year.
''George Bush versus Dan Rather is no contest for Republicans,'' Bush's campaign manager said.
So when President Trump on Tuesday walked out on an interview with Stahl, now a 60 Minutes correspondent — well, let's just say the whole thing felt a little familiar. Trump has been campaigning against the media for the last four years, but as the Bush-Rather incident suggests, it's been a part of the standard Republican playbook going back decades.
Indeed, the encounter with Stahl immediately became part of Trump's pitch to voters.
"You have to watch what we do to 60 Minutes, you'll get such a kick out of it," Trump told a rally in Pennsylvania on Tuesday night, "Lesley Stahl is not going to be happy."
There are a couple of reasons the tactic gets so much use.
First, it can be a useful distraction. In 1988, Bush managed to divert attention away from his questionable involvement in the arms-for-hostage scandal by getting the nation to talk about his battle with Rather. It even managed to get his biggest primary opponent, Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.), off the front pages for a day or two. "The Bush-Rather tiff has all but wiped Dole's Iowa campaign off the airwaves," the Christian Science Monitor noted at the time.
Trump — behind in the polls and running out of money and time — is desperate to distract voters from his record. His handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has been a disaster, and Stahl's questioning reportedly focused mostly on that topic. That is not just a legitimate line of inquiry; it is probably the most important issue of this election. Trump is trying to shift the spotlight away from his failings.
The other reason politicians — particularly Republican politicians — stage these media conflicts is because the press is an easy target, because it isn't all that popular. At the time of the Bush incident, The New York Times noted that opinion polling showed 60 percent of GOP voters thought news organizations "tend to favor one side." That sentiment has only grown with time: Gallup reported in August that 71 percent of Republicans have an unfavorable view of the media. (A majority of Democrats share that view, but by a smaller proportion.) Battling a reporter is an easy way to pick up a cheap win.
It's worth noting that Democrats take aim at the media, too. President Obama's administration used the Espionage Act to go after leakers and dig into the communications of news organizations that reported government secrets — dragging reporters through legal processes is more problematic than walking out of an interview. And Joe Biden growled at a reporter the other day for asking about his son.
But the incidents involving Trump, and Bush before him, have a different quality. They're theater. A performance. Trump wanted to be seen battling the media, to draw attention to his hatred of the press. This close to the election, Tuesday's tantrum can probably be viewed as a get-out-the-vote move. As with all things involving this president, it's probably best to take the whole thing with a grain of salt.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Foreigners in Spain facing a 100% tax on homes as the country battles a housing crisis
Under the Radar The goal is to provide 'more housing, better regulation and greater aid,' said Spain's prime minister
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: January 22, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Codeword: January 22, 2025
The Week's daily codeword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published