Republican judges are trying to steal Minnesota
They will unquestionably disenfranchise many Minnesotans, and clearly intend to do so
The Republican Party is plotting in plain sight to steal the election. The plan goes like this: Democrats are disproportionately voting by mail or early, while most Republicans are planning to vote in person on Election Day. Therefore, Republican operatives trying to get as many mail-in ballots thrown out as possible, and then will try to stop the count as soon as possible after Election Day in order to exclude any late-arriving ballots.
The whole scheme relies on the right-wing judges that President Trump and Mitch McConnell have installed throughout the court system to issue orders and rubber-stamp their actions. On Thursday, a 2-1 conservative majority on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals advanced a brazen new argument that both boosts Trump's chances in Minnesota by changing the election rules at the last minute and usurps states' control over their election systems.
The ruling instructed the state to segregate all mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day so they can be legally challenged, and likely thrown out. The reasoning is completely preposterous. The previous timetable allowing ballots to be counted so long as they were postmarked by Election Day and received by November 10 comes from a consent decree approved by the state courts in a previous case. The court majority now claims they are merely preserving the power of the legislature, but in fact Minnesota law explicitly makes allowances for the state government to follow such an agreement. Indeed, as part of the consent decree, the Trump campaign agreed in writing not to levy further challenges to the state's election. The majority didn't even bother to mention that.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Finally, the ruling baldly violates the longstanding "Purcell principle," which holds that courts should not change election rules on the eve of an election, for obvious reasons. Now, all the instructions carefully mailed out with nearly 2 million Minnesota ballots are wrong.
Without question, this ruling will disenfranchise many Minnesotans, and is clearly intended to do so. We can now expect right-wing legal Calvinball across the land, with no principle aside from "it's legal if it benefits conservatives." There can be no doubt that if the tables were turned, and it were Republican ballots coming by mail, the exact same partisan judges would cook up pretexts to extend the deadline as long as possible.
Should you live in Minnesota, I suggest returning your ballot yourself, or voting in person.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
The hunt for Planet Nine
Under The Radar Researchers seeking the elusive Earth-like planet beyond Neptune are narrowing down their search
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine interactive crossword - April 26, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - April 26, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine solutions - April 26, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - April 26, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published