Republican judges are trying to steal Minnesota
They will unquestionably disenfranchise many Minnesotans, and clearly intend to do so
The Republican Party is plotting in plain sight to steal the election. The plan goes like this: Democrats are disproportionately voting by mail or early, while most Republicans are planning to vote in person on Election Day. Therefore, Republican operatives trying to get as many mail-in ballots thrown out as possible, and then will try to stop the count as soon as possible after Election Day in order to exclude any late-arriving ballots.
The whole scheme relies on the right-wing judges that President Trump and Mitch McConnell have installed throughout the court system to issue orders and rubber-stamp their actions. On Thursday, a 2-1 conservative majority on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals advanced a brazen new argument that both boosts Trump's chances in Minnesota by changing the election rules at the last minute and usurps states' control over their election systems.
The ruling instructed the state to segregate all mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day so they can be legally challenged, and likely thrown out. The reasoning is completely preposterous. The previous timetable allowing ballots to be counted so long as they were postmarked by Election Day and received by November 10 comes from a consent decree approved by the state courts in a previous case. The court majority now claims they are merely preserving the power of the legislature, but in fact Minnesota law explicitly makes allowances for the state government to follow such an agreement. Indeed, as part of the consent decree, the Trump campaign agreed in writing not to levy further challenges to the state's election. The majority didn't even bother to mention that.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Finally, the ruling baldly violates the longstanding "Purcell principle," which holds that courts should not change election rules on the eve of an election, for obvious reasons. Now, all the instructions carefully mailed out with nearly 2 million Minnesota ballots are wrong.
Without question, this ruling will disenfranchise many Minnesotans, and is clearly intended to do so. We can now expect right-wing legal Calvinball across the land, with no principle aside from "it's legal if it benefits conservatives." There can be no doubt that if the tables were turned, and it were Republican ballots coming by mail, the exact same partisan judges would cook up pretexts to extend the deadline as long as possible.
Should you live in Minnesota, I suggest returning your ballot yourself, or voting in person.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published