One man is standing in the way of coronavirus aid
It's Mitch McConnell
Americans around the country, from the unemployed to the business class, are on tenterhooks to see if the federal government can get it together to pass another pandemic economic rescue. A bipartisan group has coalesced around a new package totaling about $908 billion — including a $300 per week boost to unemployment insurance, money for vaccine distribution, significant aid to cities and states, and another re-up of the CARES Act's grants for small businesses. It's far, far short of what is needed to ensure all Americans get what they need. Still, it's much better than nothing — roughly the bare minimum to stave off an utter catastrophe.
But there is still one enormous obstacle: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. On Tuesday, McConnell released a version of the same meager $500 billion counter-proposal he's been insisting on for months, and proceeded to attack the bipartisan deal. "The solution to this impasse has been in plain sight for a long time now for anyone willing to see it," he said Thursday, clearly implying that they should just pass his garbage plan. If he gets his way, many Americans will starve this winter.
Now, to be fair, it's hard to avoid the suspicion that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi simply did not want to pass another round of stimulus back in September and October, for fear of helping Trump win re-election. On several occasions she blew up negotiations with large asks that she surely knew were non-starters, and kept changing her demands.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That said, the House did pass a giant rescue package back in May, and McConnell could have taken it up at any time. (Indeed, if he had done so there is good reason to think Trump would have squeaked out an Electoral College victory.) And on Wednesday, Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer signaled they were willing to endorse the $908 billion proposal, cutting their previous demands by more than half. If Pelosi was sandbagging the economy to help Biden before the election, McConnell is pretty clearly aiming to do the same thing to harm him now that Biden is president-elect.
What's more, as Jordan Weismann argues at Slate, McConnell's table-scraps proposal is arguably worse than nothing. The CARES Act expansion of unemployment coverage to workers who were not previously eligible (a different program from the boost to payments), which is currently covering about 14 million people, is set to expire literally the day after Christmas, but McConnell would extend it for a measly month, and he includes no boost to normal unemployment.
Neither would he give any aid to states, cities, or transit agencies — some of which, like in D.C. and New York, are on the verge of collapse. On the contrary, McConnell would cut off the CARES Act program allowing the Federal Reserve to lend to states and cities. "The bill doesn't just deny states more help; it cuts what little safety net currently exists out from under them while they are already in free fall," Weissmann writes. And if McConnell gets this bargain, which also includes the business liability shield he has long favored, you can be absolutely certain he will do everything possible to stop another round of rescues for as long as Biden remains president.
This is just McConnell's MO. He's an utterly ruthless political operator who regards the prospect of mass unemployment, skyrocketing poverty, and tens of thousands of business failures like a hungry wolf regards a big juicy steak — so long as those things are happening under a Democratic presidential incumbent, so he or she will get blamed for them. McConnell did exactly this back in 2009-16 to harm the Obama administration, and it worked great.
Now, though, it appears that the looming economic cliff may be cracking McConnell's hold over his caucus. All that would be needed is a couple Republican votes in the Senate, and for Trump to sign on — and several conservative senators like Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) got behind the bipartisan bill Thursday afternoon. If McConnell allows the proposal to come up for a vote, it seems likely it would pass.
As an outsider, it's hard to know for sure what the most sensible negotiating stance for Democrats to take would be. But given that Democrats have little leverage and a delusional madman is president, uniting with the handful of Republicans who favor the $905 billion package, and then loudly making it clear that McConnell is the stumbling block, seems like a reasonable strategy. Mass protests might help this along as well. A good old angry mob might make Senate Republicans think twice about starving the American people for their own political benefit.
Without some kind of funding for at least getting the vaccine distributed, the economy will remain in the toilet for months or even years — perhaps threatening even the Republicans' beloved stock market. Let's hope partial sanity prevails for once.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
The Week contest: Werewolf bill
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'This needs to be a bigger deal'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Magazine solutions - November 29, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 29, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published