Impeachment season is just beginning
On the cynical nature of Trump's second impeachment
It certainly was not one of those "Tell your grandchildren" moments. For the second time in a year, Donald Trump was impeached on Wednesday afternoon in the House of Representatives by a vote of 232-197, which included 10 members of his own party, after a few hours of unmemorable speechifying. The most shocking thing about it was not being able to read Trump's own reaction.
If I were one of those commentators inclined to deal in facile superlatives, I would say that this is among the lowest points in the history of our much-vaunted lower chamber. Not because the resolution it approved was an especially wicked entry in the register of the crimes, follies, and misdeeds of the United States Congress, but because it was so painfully cynical.
Everyone voting in support of them knew the articles of impeachment were farcical. It is telling that the incendiary rhetoric employed by members of Congress during the impeachment debate does not appear in the text. Gone are the references to "domestic terrorism," the claims that a few hundred morons "laid siege" to and even "ransacked" the Capitol by taking selfies with handcuff props, smashing a few pieces of glasses, and smoking cannabis.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Instead most of the three-page document reads like a Washington Post story. Among other high crimes and misdemeanors of which he is apparently guilty, "President Trump repeatedly issued false statements," we are told, and "reiterated false claims that 'we won this election, and we won it by a landslide.'" The would-be smoking gun is even more absurd: "He also willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged — and foreseeably resulted in — lawless action at the Capitol, such as: ''If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore.'"
If telling your supporters to "fight" is an impeachable offense, every politician in the United States should be censured tomorrow. If doing so in the context of a speech in which you also urge them "to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" amounts to "insurrection or rebellion," then words, Trump's and those of his enemies, have no meaning. There is no discrete identifiable explanation for the events of January 6. The relationship between the actions of a few hundred fringe protesters in a crowd of hundred of thousands, accompanied throughout by eager photojournalists, and years of media gaslighting, lockdowns, economic downturn, educational decline, technological atomization, and questionable decisions made by the Capitol Police, is a complicated one that cannot be reduced to a single boilerplate speech by the outgoing president.
Here are some things that are true. Trump is not going to be removed from office by the Senate. There are only six days between now and the inauguration of his successor. Mike Pence is not going to be the 46th president, a bizarre footnote in the National Portrait Gallery and on those placemats still (I hope) used by children.
What did Trump's second impeachment accomplish? It certainly will not convince half the country that they were wrong to support him in November or that they are mistaken in their belief that the election was highly irregular and conducted in circumstances meant to favor his opponent. It will certainly not leave his supporters with the impression that his opponents acted against him in good faith.
As far as I can tell the only practical consequence of Trump's impeachment will be normalizing what was once an extraordinary procedure meant to get around the problem of having a head of state from whom all federal legal authority flows at the head of a partisan government. The campaign to impeach Trump began before his inauguration and continued even after it had been completed. In the future, presidents will regard the most extraordinary censure our federal government can deliver as a partisan slap on the wrist, like being held in contempt of Congress after refusing to cooperate with an absurd subpoena.
The political currency of "impeachment" has been so thoroughly debased during the last four years that any attempt to argue against Wednesday's proceedings would be as pointless as objecting to the congressional baseball game. I expect every president in my lifetime to be impeached on some absurd pretext or other, including Joe Biden.
Impeachment season is just beginning.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Matthew Walther is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has also appeared in First Things, The Spectator of London, The Catholic Herald, National Review, and other publications. He is currently writing a biography of the Rev. Montague Summers. He is also a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow.
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published