Lucian Freud: New Perspectives – a magnificent display of painterly flair

National Gallery exhibition brings together more than 60 paintings created over seven decades

Lucian Freud, ‘Bella and Esther’, 1988
Lucian Freud, ‘Bella and Esther’, 1988
(Image credit: The Lucian Freud Archive/Bridgeman Images)

This year marks the centenary of Lucian Freud’s birth – and London’s galleries aren’t about to let us forget it, said Laura Freeman in The Times. This autumn, “you can’t move for Freud books and shows”.

Entitled New Perspectives, the exhibition brings together more than 60 paintings created over the course of Freud’s seven-decade career in an attempt to examine his work afresh; it aims to disregard his complicated private life to focus on the art itself. Taking us from his “peculiar” and borderline “surreal” early works, to the “forensic and unforgiving” portraits he would come to specialise in later in life, it is a magnificent display of painterly flair that celebrates Freud’s “incomparable eye”.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Freud at his ‘most stark’

There are some fabulous pictures here, said Ben Luke in the London Evening Standard. The “deeply strange” Girl with a Kitten (1947) sees the titular cat “on the brink of having its neck wrung”, yet unlike the girl holding it, the cat meets our gaze “with a knowing calm”. In a 1946 painting, Freud depicts himself looking out from behind a thistle that resembles “an instrument of torture”. Better still is And the Bridegroom (1993), in which the performance artist Leigh Bowery lies naked on a bed next to his wife, Nicola. It represents Freud at his “most stark”, and is all the better for it.

Ultimately, though, displaying him among the masterpieces of the National Gallery’s collection confirms my doubts: the truth is that Freud was “not a genius, not even a great artist”. The show is within spitting distance of Titian and Rembrandt, among the artists Freud most “revered”. In this context, many of his paintings appear “racked” with “uncertainty and doubt”, as if he were self-consciously intent on matching his artistic forebears. Ultimately, Freud was an “uneven painter – occasionally wonderful, often very ordinary”.

YouTube YouTube
Watch On

Works ‘simply aren’t up to scratch’

Many works here “simply aren’t up to scratch”, agreed Alastair Sooke in The Daily Telegraph. A 2005 portrait of New York art dealer William Acquavella is “astonishingly ho-hum”, while Freud’s likeness of his fellow artist David Hockney, depicted with “thinning hair” and a double chin, sees its subject “blanched of vitality and flair”. His controversial portrait of the Queen, meanwhile, makes her look positively “masculine”.

Nevertheless, the gallery’s showcasing of the artist’s marvellous earlier work almost makes up for the misfires. The younger Freud approaches his sitters like “a pathologist performing an autopsy”. Sometimes, he quite literally paints carcasses: here, we see both “a cockerel’s decapitated head” and “an upside-down dead heron”.

Hotel Bedroom (1954) depicts his second wife Caroline Blackwood lying on a bed, “stiff as an effigy in a church tomb”. From the shadows, Freud himself stares down at her impassively. It is one of several “unforgettable” works here: a reminder that for a time at least, Freud really was an “inordinately exciting” painter.

National Gallery, London WC2. Until 22 January 2023