What is Theresa May's customs partnership plan?
Boris Johnson dismisses proposal as ‘crazy’

Boris Johnson has put renewed pressure on Theresa May to drop her plan for a customs partnership with the European Union.
The foreign secretary said the proposal was “totally untried” and “crazy”, raising speculation that he might resign if it were to go ahead, reports Sky News.
The customs relationship with the bloc will be “a vital part of any future trade deal, as the UK exports 50% of its goods to the EU”, says the BBC, but the issue has deeply divided May’s cabinet.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What is May’s customs partnership plan?
The arrangement would see UK officials collecting tariffs on behalf of the EU for any goods coming to the UK that were subsequently destined for any other EU member state.
Businesses would claim back any tariff rebates from the Government if the goods stayed in the UK. “Goods could then flow freely from Britain to the rest of the EU and across the Irish border without further tariffs or rules of origin checks,” says the Financial Times.
The UK government has admitted that the plan would be “unprecedented” and “challenging to implement”.
Johnson told the Daily Mail: “It’s totally untried and would make it very, very difficult to do free trade deals.
“If you have the new customs partnership, you have a crazy system whereby you end up collecting the tariffs on behalf of the EU at the UK frontier.”
The system would not help the UK take back control of our trade policies, laws, borders or our money, he added.
A spokesman for the prime minister said May still had “full confidence” in Johnson, but pointed out that he and the rest of the Cabinet had previously supported the customs partnership proposal as a future option.
When May outlined the idea at Mansion House in March, Johnson even posted a photo of himself holding a copy of the speech and giving a thumbs-up.
And the other option?
Brexiteers want May to agree to a streamlined customs arrangement in which new technology and “trusted trader” schemes minimise the need for checks on goods at the border between the UK and Ireland. The so-called “maximum facilitation” arrangement “would make an unequivocal break with the EU regime”, says The Guardian.
Earlier this month EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier’s team called both options “unworkable”, but “British Brexit officials say special scorn was reserved for the second ‘max fac’ option, which would still leave a customs border in Ireland”, reports the FT.
Could the issue topple May?
Sixty Tory MPs from the pro-Leave European Research Group (ERG) have written to May warning that her proposal is unworkable and could cause the “collapse” of the Government.
Jacob Rees-Mogg, head of the ERG, said his group was “not in the business of making threats”, but warned that the proposed customs partnership was “deeply flawed and would not take us out of the EU”.
Nevertheless, according to Politico’s Jack Blanchard, “allies insist May will press ahead in making the case for her option”, arguing that the customs partnership is a smart compromise.
A spokesperson for the PM said: “Following last week's sub-committee meeting, it was agreed that there are unresolved issues in relation to both models and that further work is needed. The Prime Minister asked officials to take forward that work as a priority.”
Financial Times journalist James Blitz suggests that pro-Leave ministers may be making empty threats and recognise that May resigning is not in their best interests.
“Hard Brexiters get loud and aggressive when they are losing a key fight on Brexit,” Blitz says. “But they know, too, that they cannot bring Mrs May down, for fear of derailing Brexit altogether. So their hands are tied.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Wonder drug': the potential health benefits of creatine
The Explainer Popular fitness supplement shows promise in easing symptoms of everything from depression to menopause and could even help prevent Alzheimer's
-
What's next for Elon Musk?
Today's Big Question The world's richest man has become 'disillusioned' with politics – but returning to his tech empire presents its own challenges
-
Quiz of The Week: 24 – 30 May
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
-
Angela Rayner: Labour's next leader?
Today's Big Question A leaked memo has sparked speculation that the deputy PM is positioning herself as the left-of-centre alternative to Keir Starmer
-
Brexit 'reset' deal: how will it work?
In Depth Keir Stamer says the deal is a 'win-win', but he faces claims that he has 'surrendered' to Brussels on fishing rights
-
Are we entering the post-Brexit era?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer's 'big bet' with his EU reset deal is that 'nobody really cares' about Brexit any more
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
Can Starmer sell himself as the 'tough on immigration' PM?
Today's Big Question Former human rights lawyer 'now needs to own the change – not just mouth the slogans' to win over a sceptical public
-
Has Starmer put Britain back on the world stage?
Talking Point UK takes leading role in Europe on Ukraine and Starmer praised as credible 'bridge' with the US under Trump
-
Trump vows 25% tariffs on EU at Cabinet meeting
Speed Read The tariff threats serve to enhance a growing suspicion that the president views Europe as an adversary, not an ally
-
Why are Europe's leaders raising red flags about Trump's Ukraine overtures to Putin?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Officials from across the continent warn that any peace plan without their input is doomed from the start