BHP: London’s lost bauble

Bad news for the FTSE 100, said Neil Hume in the Financial Times. The UK blue-chip index “is set to lose its biggest company”. The £137bn Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP is ditching its “dual-corporate structure”, which currently sees it listed as two separate companies on the London and Sydney stock exchanges, and shifting its “primary stock-listing to Australia”.

The move marks “the most radical overhaul” to BHP’s business since it was formed in a merger two decades ago, said August Graham on PA Media. Some investors, notably the activist New York-based hedge fund Elliott Advisors, have been pushing for this “for years”, as a means of unlocking billions in value.

Yet BHP’s already in the money, said Hume in the FT. This year’s commodities boom has delivered soaring profits of US$24.6bn, enabling it to deliver “a record final dividend” of $10.1bn. Moreover, CEO Mike Henry is making good progress shifting focus towards in-demand metals like copper and nickel, and “green commodities” – this week confirming a plan to merge BHP’s oil and gas business with Australia’s Woodside.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The shift Down Under could yet hit a pothole. In 2018, the Anglo-Dutch giant Unilever dropped a comparable “unification” scheme involving relocation to Rotterdam, following pressure from London shareholders. A similar rebellion may now be fermenting over BHP. “For UK investors this sucks,” complained one investor. “This is a fantastic company.”