When the WHO director general privately 'lost patience' with China

World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was perhaps not as soft on China during the pandemic as was previously thought, according to The Washington Post, per reporting from the upcoming novel Aftershocks: Pandemic Politics and the End of the Old International Order.

The book, written by Thomas Wright and Colin Kahl, details how Ghebreyesus "cautiously praised China in public while pressuring it in private," and in fact even "lost patience" with the country for attempting to influence COVID-19 origin probes, the Post reports.

When a WHO team in China reportedly twice dismissed the lab leak theory as "extremely unlikely" and "unworthy of further investigation," Ghebreyesus pushed back on the results, maintaining that the research was not "extensive enough" and lacked "timely and comprehensive data-sharing," writes the Post, per Wright and Kahl. The investigative team was reportedly "defensive" in their response, and mentioned "pressure from Chinese officials that led to a compromise."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

And since then, relations between the two entities have "nosedived." When the WHO team's official findings, released in March, repeated the lab leak theory to be extremely unlikely, Ghebreyesus told China's envoy in Geneva that he would tell the truth about the report "even if China did not like it," per Wright and Kahl.

But Ghebreyesus' soft public posture toward China was at odds with the stance taken by the administration of former President Donald Trump, who Wright claims "undermined" the lab leak theory by "taking it too far." "That U.S.-China rivalry really shaped everything else," he said. Read more at The Washington Post.