Coronavirus: is the UK heading for a New Year national lockdown?
Number of Covid patients in hospital set to match April peak by New Year’s Eve, Boris Johnson warned

As the new strain of Covid-19 spreads across the country, expectations are rising that the New Year could herald a third UK-wide lockdown.
Boris Johnson has been warned by Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty that infections are rising across the country and last night the government’s Chief Scientific Adviser Patrick Vallance said the virus was no longer confined to London and the Southeast.
It is likely that the number of areas placed into Tier 4 regulations “need to be increased”, Valance said, after Whitty privately told “the prime minister that the number of patients in hospital with Covid is on course to match the April peak by New Year's Eve - and will continue increasing in January”, the Daily Mail reports.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Happy new tier
With the Covid strain starting to appear across the country, “it is pretty obvious there will now be a clamour from some government scientists and parts of the media for most, if not all of the country to go into Tier 4”, writes Politico’s Alex Wickham.
While Vallance was clear in his warning about heightened tier regulations, government officials are less keen to be drawn on whether “Vallance’s remarks effectively amounted to him calling for a third national lockdown”, Wickham adds.
Downing Street has moved to “play down suggestions that a third national lockdown was imminent”, the Daily Mail says. However, government scientific advisers told The Guardian that a failure to lock down quickly could cost tens of thousands of lives and risk an “economic, human and social disaster”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Robert West, a professor of health psychology at University College London’s Institute of Epidemiology and Health who sits on the behavioural science advisory group for Sage, told the paper was that the current system was “unlikely” to contain the spread.
The UK will need to move to “stricter but more rational social distancing rules”, he said, as well as building a “test, travel, isolate and support programme” similar to the one seen in Asian countries that has suppressed the virus.
“It sounds expensive but the alternative could well be a catastrophic collapse in confidence in the country’s ability to control the virus and the economic, human and social disaster that would follow,” West added.
‘Blindsided’
Downing Street was aware of a rising problem in early December, with internal assessments suggesting that “there [would] be nearly 700,000 cases a week by mid- to late- February - more than three times the present level - with 20,000 hospital admissions and 5,000 deaths,” The Times reports.
However, the modelling behind those projections was done before the new mutation was discovered. The paper’s deputy political editor Steve Swinford says the extent of the threat from the new strain only became apparent in a meeting last Friday.
One government source told Swinford that after that meeting, led by chair of the government’s scientific advisory groups Professor Peter Horby: “Everyone was blindsided. I don’t think anyone in the room expected it to be quite so bad.”
The atmosphere in Downing Street after that meeting was described as “grim” by an insider, with a senior aide telling the paper that with Christmas just around the corner, their sense was “it’s all fucked”.
Backbench tiers
West’s warning is by no means confined to the scientific community. One senior Conservative tells Politico: “If the new strain is already in Tier 3 areas and the scientific advice is that Tier 3 is not enough to suppress it, we are going to have to come up with a damn good reason why we aren’t putting them in Tier 4 right away.”
The government should move to sidestep the same criticism they have received previously by moving swiftly to avoid being asked “why didn’t we do it sooner” in two weeks’ time, the MP added.
Asked why tighter restrictions were not being rolled out more widely, a government spokesperson said that “we’ve been clear that people shouldn’t be travelling out of Tier 4 areas, and I would point to the changes that we have made in terms of Tier 4”. “We’re being clear that people should remain at home and limit human interaction,” they added.
One senior Tory told the Daily Mail that Johnson had decided against “ordering another national lockdown at the weekend only after Chief Whip Mark Spencer warned it would spark a mutiny among Conservative MPs”.
But with the new strain cropping up further and further away from the Southeast, the scientific advisers closest to Johnson are beginning to warn that “stronger curbs” are likely, The Guardian reports.
Joe Evans is the world news editor at TheWeek.co.uk. He joined the team in 2019 and held roles including deputy news editor and acting news editor before moving into his current position in early 2021. He is a regular panellist on The Week Unwrapped podcast, discussing politics and foreign affairs.
Before joining The Week, he worked as a freelance journalist covering the UK and Ireland for German newspapers and magazines. A series of features on Brexit and the Irish border got him nominated for the Hostwriter Prize in 2019. Prior to settling down in London, he lived and worked in Cambodia, where he ran communications for a non-governmental organisation and worked as a journalist covering Southeast Asia. He has a master’s degree in journalism from City, University of London, and before that studied English Literature at the University of Manchester.
-
Nicola Sturgeon's memoir: making the personal political
Talking Point Former Scottish first minister attempts to set record straight in 'Frankly' but does she leave more questions than answers?
-
Trump-Putin: would land swap deal end Ukraine war?
Today's Big Question Ukraine ready to make 'painful but acceptable' territorial concessions – but it still might not be enough for Vladimir Putin
-
The truth about sunscreen
The Explainer The science behind influencer claims that sun cream is toxic
-
Why is Trump attacking Intel's CEO?
Today's Big Question Concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's Chinese connections
-
Will Trump privatize Social Security?
Today's Big Question Bessent calls savings program a 'back door' to privatization
-
How does the EPA plan to invalidate a core scientific finding?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Administrator Lee Zeldin says he's 'driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion.' But is his plan to undermine a key Obama-era greenhouse gas emissions policy scientifically sound — or politically feasible?
-
China is building the world's biggest hydropower dam. Is it a 'water bomb' aimed at India?
Today's Big Question River is a 'lifeline for millions' across Asia
-
Is Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' cancellation an omen of something worse?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION CBS said its decision to end the talk show was strictly business. But the timing and nature of the announcement has some observers wondering if there's more at play behind the scenes.
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?
Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Can Texas redistricting save the US House for the GOP?
Today's Big Question Trump pushes a 'ruthless' new plan, but it could backfire
-
Could Trump really 'take over' American cities?
Today's Big Question Trump has proposed a federal takeover of New York City and Washington, D.C.