Judy Chicago: Revelations – an 'absorbing' show from a pioneering feminist artist

A visitor looks at a painting during the preview of Judy Chicago: Revelations at Serpentine North Gallery

The exhibits tear 'into men and their history with unconfined zest'

(Image credit: Stephen Chung / Alamy Stock Photo)

For 60 years, the American feminist artist Judy Chicago has been making "thunderous art driven by the certainty that men are bad and women are good", said Waldemar Januszczak in The Sunday Times. Born Judith Cohen to liberal Jewish parents in Chicago in 1939, she adopted the name of her home city "as an act of American camouflage" and, from the 1960s, sought to create a form of art that went against the grain of tasteful, male-dominated modernism. Once derided by the art establishment, Chicago's angry, unsubtle and frequently thrilling work is finally getting the recognition it deserves.

This new exhibition confirms her as an artistic "pioneer" possessed of a "particularly intense" imagination. Taking as its starting point an unpublished illuminated manuscript from the 1970s that retells the "Book of Genesis" from a feminist perspective – it begins in a paediatric unit – the show contains some 200 paintings, drawings and installations created over the course of her career. Its exhibits tear "into men and their history with unconfined zest"; the result is a "weird" and "impactful" event.

"Intense" is the operative word here, said Alastair Sooke in The Telegraph. Much of the work in this "absorbing" show revolves around childbirth, an "iconographic void within art history", which Chicago "admirably sought to fill". A case in point is 1982's "In the Beginning", a 32ft-long "primordial panorama" in which "a newborn suckles on lava-coloured nipples" and tiny creatures "spew from a suggestive chasm". Or there's "The Crowning" (2010), a work at once "like a vorticist painting and a Mayan relief": an "unforgettable" vision of a baby's head emerging during birth. This is a sometimes "mesmerising" show, even if Chicago's depictions of men as "grimacing, nose-picking, sloppily urinating horrors" are "caricatured and ludicrous", and her thoughts on climate change "have the nuance of a placard".

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Chicago can be "crude" and sometimes unforgivably "twee", said Laura Cumming in The Observer. "What if Women Ruled the World?" (2023), for instance, is a vast, winsome series of quilted hangings that imagines a planet governed by "peace, love and female understanding". Yet, by and large, her aesthetics and her graphic style are insistently compelling throughout. Early works such as 1974's "Peeling Back" are "trippy, psychedelic, glowing with vibrations, yet immaculately graphic", her "beautifully smooth gradations of colour" and "distinctive cursive script" a delightful expressive reaction to 1960s minimalism. A series of silhouette drawings, meanwhile, is "terrific, hazy around the edges, pin-sharp with the shapes of women in labour, or childbirth". Perhaps most importantly, Chicago's art always "holds itself open to dispute": my advice is to "take a friend", consider what you see, "then go ahead and argue".