Trump, legal experts agree he faces imminent indictment in federal Jan. 6 investigation

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Former President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he will soon be indicted in special counsel Jack Smith's investigation of attempts to overturn the 2020 election, and legal experts agree that is a correct reading of the target letter he received from Smith on Sunday. The letter, which Trump disclosed on social media Tuesday morning, gave the former president four days to testify before a grand jury in Washington, D.C.
Trump is expected to decline the invitation to testify, and the grand jury could vote to indict him soon after the deadline passes.
This would be Smith's second indictment of Trump, after the 37 criminal charges he filed last month for retaining top secret documents at his Mar-a-Lago club and obstructing efforts to get them back. Trump was also indicted by Manhattan's district attorney in March over hush-money payments to a porn actress, and he could face a fourth set of criminal charges in Fulton County, Georgia, as soon as August, also for trying to overturn his loss to President Biden.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Using the Mar-a-Lago case as a guide, an indictment could come next week" in Smith's election tampering case, former federal prosecutor and Justice Department official Brandon Van Grack told USA Today.
Until any indictment is unsealed, we won't know what crimes Smith is alleging, but the letter indicated Trump could be charged under three federal statutes, The New York Times and ABC News report: conspiracy to defraud the U.S., deprivation of rights under color of law, and tampering with a witness, victim, or informant.
Smith is said to be investigating whether Trump and his allies pressured Vice President Mike Pence to overturn Biden's win in the electoral college, what role Trump played in setting up fake electors in several swing states he lost, and whether his campaign committed fraud by raising money off his false election fraud claims. The now-disbanded House Jan. 6 Committee, in referring Trump for criminal prosecution, concluded that he was at the center of a complex, months-long effort to reverse his loss.
Smith's D.C. grand jury is evidently still hearing testimony from witnesses in the investigation, and Trump's team has been asking around to learn if any other potential defendants in the case have also received target letters from Smith. "We can't find anyone," a source told ABC News on Tuesday afternoon. Attorneys for Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, a lawyer who promoted the false idea that Pence could overturn the election, have said their clients have not received target letters.
Trump criticized the imminent indictment in a Tuesday night interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. "You could call it fascist, you could call it Marxist, you could call it communist, what they're doing," he said. "like with the Department of Justice they've totally weaponized that, it's weaponized like we've never had this before."
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Peter Weber is a senior editor at TheWeek.com, and has handled the editorial night shift since the website launched in 2008. A graduate of Northwestern University, Peter has worked at Facts on File and The New York Times Magazine. He speaks Spanish and Italian and plays bass and rhythm cello in an Austin rock band. Follow him on Twitter.
-
The daily gossip: Drew Barrymore and Bill Maher pause returns after strike backlash, Russell Brand denies sexual assault allegations, and more
The daily gossip: September 18, 2023
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
Wagging
By The Week Staff Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Pint pricing, climate wisdom and centrism
Podcast Should pubs charge more at peak times? What can Indigenous cultures teach the West about climate change? And are we disagreeing too agreeably?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Donald Trump's Rosh Hashanah message to 'liberal Jews' reignites antisemitism debate
Was targeting his critics who 'voted to destroy America & Israel' the right way to mark the High Holidays?
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
What might a post-Mitch McConnell GOP look like?
Here's what to watch for as questions about the longtime Senate leader swirl.
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Rishi Sunak lambasts China after allegations of spy in UK Parliament
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Judge denies Mark Meadows' request to move Georgia case to federal court
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson dies at 75
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Clarence Thomas officially discloses trips from billionaire GOP donor
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Is Glenn Youngkin the GOP's dark horse white knight Trump alternative?
Today's Big Question The Virginia governor has played coy, but some Republican insiders are eyeing him as a viable 2024 presidential candidate
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Could the 14th Amendment be Trump's undoing?
Today's Big Question How a post-Civil War amendment against insurrectionists could disqualify Trump
By Harold Maass Published