Donald Trump foundation sued by New York
State attorney general says the foundation is ‘little more than a chequebook’
The New York attorney general has filed a lawsuit against the Donald J Trump charitable foundation, as well as Donald Trump himself and three of his children, claiming he violated state charity and federal election laws.
It alleges that “the Trumps used charitable assets as ‘little more than a chequebook for payments to not-for-profits from Mr Trump’ and his companies”, The Guardian reports.
Other allegations include the claim that Trump Foundation funds and assets were used to pay for a painting of Donald Trump to be hung at one of his golf clubs, and that other assets were used to settle legal claims against another of Trump’s clubs.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The foundation is little more than an empty shell that functions with no oversight from its board of directors,” the lawsuit alleges. “Trump ran the foundation according to whim, rather than law.”
Barbara Underwood, the state attorney general, is “asking a court to dissolve the Trump Foundation and wants $2.8 million in restitution, plus additional penalties”, CNN reports.
The lawsuit is also seeking to ban Trump from serving as a director of any New York not-for-profit for ten years, and a one-year ban for Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump.
The president has dismissed the claims made in the lawsuit as the work of “sleazy New York Democrats”, and has vowed not to pay the restitution or settle the lawsuit out of court.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
But the New York attorney general has “significant investigatory and prosecutorial power”, says the BBC. “There’s no telling what she might turn up” if she begins looking deeper into Trump’s “more questionable charitable activities”.
-
Who were the ‘weekend snipers’ of Sarajevo?Under the Radar Italian authorities launch investigation into allegations far-right gun enthusiasts paid to travel to Bosnian capital and shoot civilians ‘for fun’ during the four-year siege
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Glinda vs. Elphaba, Jennifer Lawrence vs. postpartum depression and wilderness vs. progress in November moviesthe week recommends This month’s new releases include ‘Wicked: For Good,’ ‘Die My Love’ and ‘Train Dreams’
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
‘America today isn’t just looking to overcome’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Trump tariffs face stiff scrutiny at Supreme CourtSpeed Read Even some of the Court’s conservative justices appeared skeptical