With relations between the U.S. and Canada at an all-time low and President Donald Trump's agenda of sweeping tariffs wreaking acute damage on global finances, yesterday's meeting between him and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney offered both leaders an opportunity to feel one another out as they each asserted their shifting national priorities. The leaders emerged from the sit-down with diverging views on what they each achieved and where they go from here.
'Decidedly different tone' Carney's "mixture of flattery and firmness" during his first meeting with Trump resulted in a "respectful repartee" between the two leaders, said The Washington Post. At one point, Trump insisted that annexing Canada as an American state would be a "wonderful marriage." Carney responded: "As you know from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale." It was an attempt to "charm" the president while also signaling that he was "up for the job of standing up to Trump."
Trump took on a "decidedly different tone" than before, particularly after framing Canadians as a "bunch of freeloaders" in a post on Truth Social shared just as Carney arrived at the White House, said The New York Times. While Carney may have "appeared to be walking into a lion's den," it was a "house cat he found there" instead. Carney "never quite dropped his guard" even as Trump appeared to be "coming face to face with the consequences of his own actions and not quite wanting to deal with them."
'Test for US allies' Even though Trump "refused to back off" from his threats of sweeping tariffs and the annexation of Canada, he was "largely friendlier toward" Carney than he had been toward former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, said The Hill. The result was a "more serious engagement," said The Toronto Star. Behind closed doors, Trump "sought Carney's views" on a "range" of issues, including those with "China, Russia, Ukraine, Iran and the Middle East."
Ultimately, Carney's largely hiccup-free meeting presented a "test for U.S. allies more generally" as they have "struggled to manage the president's upending of relationships around the world," said the Post. "Being too unyielding," like the contentious sit-down with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy, "risks getting kicked out of the White House," while "too soft an approach can be ineffective or prompt blowback from constituents." |