The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • Student Offers
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week Evening Review
    The conflicting case for war, Iceland and Norway eye EU status, and Anthropic’s resistance

     
    Talking Points

    How strong is Trump’s case for war with Iran?

    The U.S. is now at war with Iran, but the rationale for that decision is still hard to pin down. President Donald Trump has offered a fluctuating series of explanations, creating confusion for Congress and the public.

    The president’s rationale for war “keeps shifting,” said The Washington Post. His proffered reasons for bombing Tehran range from “regime change to preemption to eliminating its nuclear program and ballistic missiles.” If the U.S. had stayed its hand, Iran “would have had a nuclear war and they would have taken out many countries,” Trump said today. But such assertions are “incomplete, unsubstantiated or flat-out wrong,” said The Wall Street Journal. 

    The hard way?
    “Why is Trump attacking Iran? He’s still figuring it out,” said S.V. Date at HuffPost. Days after the bombs started dropping, the president has “not given Congress or the American people a detailed explanation.” But it was Iran that chose war by refusing to compromise on its nuclear program, said the Journal’s editorial board. By failing to deal, Tehran was “testing Trump’s patience.”

    Trump’s “pitiful” case for war rests on two pillars, said Daniel DePetris at The Chicago Tribune. The first is that Iran is an “imminent national security threat to U.S. interests,” and the second is that Tehran “never wanted to find a diplomatic route out of the nuclear crisis.” That case is completely “wrong.” There’s no evidence that Iran is close to a bomb. The president chose to fight “without a rationale that was even semi-convincing.”

    Iran “chose the hard way,” said the National Review editorial board. The Islamic regime has been a “destabilizing force in the region and a leading sponsor of terrorism,” and U.S. presidents have operated under an unwritten rule that Iran “could kill and maim Americans and we could never directly hit back.” The war will degrade Tehran’s ability to “project its malign influence.”

    Mixed messages
    The question is whether Trump can win this war if he “can’t explain why he started it,” Susan B. Glasser said at The New Yorker. The shifting explanations make it easier for him to “claim victory no matter what happens.”

    Trump is “sending mixed messages” about the war’s endgame, said Bloomberg. The public as yet remains unconvinced. “Nearly 6 in 10 Americans disapprove” of the decision to go to war, said CNN.

     
     
    QUOTE OF THE DAY

    ‘If you guys are doing that, I am done. You can hold me in contempt from now until the cows come home.’

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, during a closed-door deposition to the House Oversight Committee for its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, responding to Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) sending an unauthorized photo of Clinton to a far-right influencer, who then put it on social media. “This is just typical behavior,” she added.

     
     
    TODAY’S BIG QUESTION

    Why would Iceland and Norway want to join the EU?

    In the face of geopolitical uncertainty and U.S. hostility, “momentum for EU enlargement appears to be growing,” said Politico. Iceland and Norway, both founding members of NATO, have access to the EU’s single market via its European Economic Area but are the only Nordic countries outside the bloc. Now, Reykjavík looks set to announce the date of its promised referendum on whether to restart frozen membership talks. 

    What did the commentators say?
    Iceland applied to join the EU in 2009, at the peak of the country’s financial crisis. But after the economy stabilized and flourished, an incoming center-right government froze membership talks in 2013. But shockwaves caused by President Donald Trump’s recent threats to neighboring Greenland are now pushing Iceland “closer to the EU,” said Xenia Heiberg at Euractiv. Icelanders are being forced to evaluate bloc membership “not as an economic choice” but as a “question of long-term defence and geopolitical alignment.” 

    Iceland is the only NATO member without an army, relying on a defense agreement with the U.S. for security. That, more than the economic benefits, is “warming public attitudes” about joining the bloc, said Politico. The sense of urgency increased last month when Trump’s nominee for ambassador to Iceland joked that the strategically important Arctic country would become the U.S.’s “52nd state.” 

    A “flurry of visits” from EU politicians to Iceland and vice versa have taken place amid growing concerns. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently hosted Iceland’s Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir in Brussels (pictured above). Their partnership “offers stability and predictability in a volatile world,” said von der Leyen.

    Norway, the “closest nonmember country to the EU,” has voted no in two referendums on joining the bloc, said the Financial Times. But with Trump’s tariffs and the war in Ukraine, Norway is suffering as a result of its outside status. “We are acutely aware that the delta between EU membership and EEA membership is increasing,” said Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide last fall.

    What next?
    Iceland’s path to EU membership “isn’t straightforward,” said Politico. Even if Icelanders vote yes in a referendum on restarting talks, there would need to be another on membership. That could be a “high bar to clear.” Norway’s leadership has, for now, ruled out another EU debate. But Oslo is closely watching Iceland’s referendum.

     
     

    Statistic of the day

    72: The number of tigers who have died at two animal parks for tourists in northern Thailand due to canine distemper virus, according to officials. The news allayed fears when bird flu was ruled out as a potential cause. There has not been an “animal-to-human infection case,” said Public Health Minister Pattana Promphat.

     
     
    In the Spotlight

    Anthropic: the face of AI resistance in DOD feud

    The Trump administration has long trumpeted its goal to automate its operational capacity through artificial intelligence models. But as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth moves to offload certain human operations into the realm of the algorithm, one tech firm has emerged as a counterbalance to the White House’s vision for an artificially intelligent military: Anthropic, which “cannot in good conscience” allow Hegseth’s Pentagon to use its AI models without limitations, said CEO Dario Amodei. 

    ‘Bold stand on ethical grounds’
    Despite believing in the “existential importance” of using AI to protect the U.S. and “defeat our autocratic adversaries,” Anthropic has identified a “narrow set of cases” including mass domestic surveillance and “fully autonomous weapons” wherein AI can “undermine, rather than defend, democratic values,” Amodei said in a company statement. Hegseth’s allegedly retaliatory move to blacklist Anthropic is "inherently contradictory” for labeling the company a security risk and simultaneously “essential to national security.” 

    Hegseth's “heaviest-handed way you can regulate a business” marks a “landmark moment” for how the Pentagon “interacts with our cutting-edge technology developed on U.S. soil” in general, said Katie Sweeten, a former Justice Department official who coordinated the relationship between the DOJ and the Pentagon, at Politico. While Amodei's company faces a government ban, his “main rival,” OpenAI's Sam Altman, "struck his own deal” to fill Anthropic's Defense Department role, said CBS News. 

    By “refusing to bow” to a White House intent on “bullying private companies into submission,” Amodei is “taking a bold stand on ethical grounds,” said The Atlantic. While the company’s competitors “jockey for dominance” in the field, Anthropic has “distinguished itself by emphasizing safety.” 

    Negotiation vs. regulation
    Anthropic is “rightly concerned” that its products could be used for “unsafe or malicious” ends, said former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall at The New York Times. But the company is wrong for trying to use “contractual terms” to either “prevent the misuse of its products” or at least “deflect responsibility.” But Anthropic also has the option to not sell to the government at all. The government, meanwhile, “cannot be expected to negotiate provisions” like Anthropic is asking for with all its partners, which would be a “nightmare to administer and unenforceable.” What, then, could be “appropriate” to address this debate? “Regulation by Congress.”

     
     

    Good day 🐎

    … for equine understanding. Whinnying horses are essentially whistling and singing at the same time, clarifying why they produce higher-pitched sounds, according to a paper published in the journal Current Biology. Despite being domesticated for over 4,000 years, scientists still “didn’t know till now how they make sounds,” said Elodie Briefer, one of the paper’s senior authors.

     
     

    Bad day ☢️

    … for nuclear safety. U.S. counties located closer to operational nuclear power plants have higher cancer mortality rates than counties farther away, according to a study published in the journal Nature Communications. And more studies are needed, “particularly at a time when nuclear power is being promoted as a clean solution to climate change,” said senior study author Petros Koutrakis.

     
     
    Picture of the day

    Highly anticipated

    Giraffe calf Mumbi makes her public debut at Germany’s Opel Zoo. Born 10 days ago after a gestation of 15 months, the reticulated giraffe was given a Kenyan name to reflect her origins in Africa, where only 21,000 of the endangered species remain.
    Andreas Arnold / DPA /Alamy Live News

     
     
    Puzzles

    Daily sudoku

    Challenge yourself with The Week’s daily sudoku, part of our puzzles section, which also includes guess the number

    Play here

     
     
    The Week recommends

    Have the spring break of your dreams

    There’s no one way to do spring break. Embrace the snow and take a ski trip. Disappear off-grid to a remote locale. Flee the cold and head to the beach. Let these ideas inspire your bespoke getaway.

    Race down the slopes
    Sure, you are on spring break, but it's still a winter wonderland at Canada’s Club Med Québec Charlevoix. This mountain escape offers “crisp air” and a “place to truly unwind,” said Fodor's Travel. The slopes overlook the St. Lawrence River, and because the property is all-inclusive, lift passes, group ski lessons for kids, teens and adults, and unlimited ski-in/ski-out access are included in every stay.

    Savor the great outdoors
    In the heart of Chile’s spectacular Torres del Paine National Park is Hotel Las Torres Patagonia (pictured above), a family-owned lodge giving guests the chance to choose between dozens of different guided experiences, each showing a different side of Patagonia. Torres del Paine’s “rugged wilderness” is a “dreamscape,” filled with grasslands, “jagged granite peaks” and “glacier-fed lakes,” making it a “rewarding” spot for hikers, said Afar. 

    Hit the sand and links
    Everything you need for an “unforgettable tropical escape” can be found at Tryall Golf & Beach Club, Montego Bay, Jamaica, said Forbes. There’s a world-class golf course, a beach club, tennis and pickleball facilities, and a luxurious spa, plus an untouched, private stretch of shoreline that’s more than a mile long. It’s the perfect location to splash around or plop a chair, soak up the sun and watch the waves.

    Read more

     
     

    Poll watch

    A majority of Americans (84%) believe vaccines for diseases like measles, mumps and rubella are safe for children, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey. That majority includes 92% of Democrats and 81% of Republicans. Nearly three out of four (74%) think the government should require healthy children to be vaccinated to attend school.

     
     
    INSTANT OPINION

    Today’s best commentary

    ‘The cost of chaos at the CDC’
    Leana S. Wen at The Washington Post
    Nearly “half of the CDC’s routinely updated databases were paused without explanation between May and October 2025,” and “without up-to-date data, health officials cannot identify gaps or direct education and outreach where they are most needed,” says Leana S. Wen. When funding is “withdrawn at this scale, local and state governments have little realistic prospect to replace it.” Even if “some of the money is eventually restored through litigation, the damage may be difficult to undo.”

    ‘Don’t just freeze federal assistance to fight fraud — fix the program’
    Parth Patel at The Hill
    Headlines have been “dominated by scandal: phantom day cares, faked receipts, and misuse of taxpayer dollars,” says Parth Patel, but these are “not an aberration. They are the predictable result of a system that measures compliance instead of outcomes.” The real “scandal of the American welfare system isn’t just that money is being stolen — it’s that the money we do spend isn’t helping people escape poverty. Rather, it’s trapping them in poverty.”

    ‘Retirement is a strategic mistake, unless we redesign life for the intelligent age’
    Klaus Schwab at Time
    Longevity is “not merely a medical achievement. It’s a structural shift in the human condition,” says Klaus Schwab. But humans “continue to organize life according to a model designed for a 70-year or shorter lifespan. Education, career, retirement — that’s how we think about life.“ We “must apply systemic thinking to the architecture of life itself.“ A 100-year life “cannot be compressed into a front-loaded education, a 40-year career sprint, and three decades of passive withdrawal.”

     
     
    WORD OF THE DAY

    bossware

    Software that managers use to supervise and surveil employees in the workplace. AI allows employers to monitor workers with bossware in “more predictive or granular ways,” said Karen Levy, a professor at Cornell and the author of “Data Driven: Truckers, Technology, and the New Workplace Surveillance.”

     
     

    Evening Review was written and edited by Theara Coleman, Nadia Croes, Catherine Garcia, Scott Hocker, Justin Klawans, Harriet Marsden, Joel Mathis, Summer Meza and Rafi Schwartz, with illustrations by Stephen Kelly and Julia Wytrazek.

    Image credits, from top: Illustration by Julia Wytrazek / Getty Images; Simon Wohlfahrt / AFP / Getty Images; Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images; Hotel Las Torres Patagonia
     

    Recent editions

    • Morning Report

      Trump floats lengthy Iran war

    • Evening Review

      Trump’s true doctrine

    • Morning Report

      Iran war spreads across Middle East

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.