Russian commanders are charging “up to $40,000 to spare soldiers from the front lines in Ukraine,” said The Telegraph. Recruits unwilling or unable to pay are “reset,” a “euphemism for sending them to their deaths” on the front line.
Wounded soldiers must “pay thousands” to be declared unfit for active service, said PBS. Those who do not are “forced to literally limp into battle.” Injured soldiers, sometimes on crutches, are being “used as bait” to “draw fire” from hidden Ukrainian artillery, said Seth Jones, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, to the outlet.
‘Extortion and punishment’ “Corruption and slave labor have long been features of the Russian and Soviet armies,” said The Economist. Soldiers are viewed as “cannon fodder” for their superiors and as a “source of enrichment.” Infantry soldiers must “buy their own” military gear in the Russian army, which operates on a “system of extortion and punishment.” Officers demand money from their men “under the pretext of raising money for drones, equipment or food.” Sources have even told of commanders who “requisition troops’ bank cards and PIN codes” before sending them into battle.
In the Russian military, soldiers “learn quickly to fear their commanders more than their foe,” said PBS. Videos on social media depict the “horrific punishments” if they fail to pay up, with reports of some “being locked in cages, electrocuted and sexually assaulted.”
‘Public resentment’ The problem is widespread, said The New York Times. In the last two years, “at least 12 high-ranking Russian military officials and generals, as well as dozens of lower-ranking officers, have been indicted on corruption charges.”
Most recently, Lieutenant Colonel Konstantin Frolov, known as the Executioner, has been put on trial in a military court, accused of leading a scheme in which “more than 30 soldiers and medics” in his regiment “used weapons to shoot themselves in order to obtain payouts for battlefield injuries.” The plot reportedly defrauded the army of “200 million rubles,” equivalent to more than $2.6 million. This case, in particular, has “fed public resentment of the economic and social privileges” of high-ranking officials, who are accused of perpetuating the war “only for the money.”
|