The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • Student Offers
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • Brand Logo
    SCOTUS checks POTUS, Epstein haunts Trump and Oklahoma’s zero intolerance

     
    TODAY’S LEGAL story

    Supreme Court bars Trump’s military use in Chicago

    What happened
    The Supreme Court yesterday blocked President Donald Trump from deploying the National Guard in the Chicago area to bolster his mass deportation push. “At this preliminary stage, the government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the court said in an unsigned emergency docket opinion. Three conservative justices — Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch — publicly dissented. 

    Who said what
    The ruling was a “rare setback” for Trump before a conservative Supreme Court that has “frequently backed his broad assertions of presidential authority,” Reuters said. This was the “first time the justices have weighed in on Trump’s efforts to dispatch the military to American cities,” The Wall Street Journal said, and their “preliminary” ruling suggests they are “unwilling to rubber-stamp Trump’s assertions of broad authority to use the National Guard to manage protests and violent crime.” 

    Yesterday’s ruling “hinged on the definition of ‘regular forces,’” the Journal said. Lower courts had blocked Trump’s deployment after determining that anti-ICE protests aren’t a brewing “rebellion,” but the justices found that Trump had failed to meet the other condition needed to nationalize the Guard over the objections of state officials: showing he was “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” The court’s majority agreed with Illinois that “regular forces” likely meant the U.S. military, not federal agents. They also noted that presidents can only use the regular military for domestic law enforcement under “exceptional” circumstances because of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. 

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) welcomed the ruling as “an important step in curbing the Trump administration’s consistent abuse of power and slowing Trump’s march toward authoritarianism.” The White House said the ruling doesn’t detract from Trump’s “core agenda” of immigration enforcement and protecting federal personnel from “violent rioters.”

    What next?
    The decision was “not a final ruling,” but it could affect pending legal challenges to Trump’s “attempts to deploy the military in other Democratic-led cities,” The Associated Press said. Lower courts have blocked Trump’s deployments in Oregon and California. But some Republican governors have welcomed National Guard missions in their Democratic-run cities, and minutes after yesterday’s ruling, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) announced that about 350 Guard troops will join immigration agents in New Orleans before New Year’s Eve.

     
     
    TODAY’S EPSTEIN story

    Trump appears numerous times in new Epstein batch

    What happened
    The Justice Department yesterday released its second large batch of files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and unlike the tranche released over the weekend, President Donald Trump is mentioned multiple times. The latest 30,000 pages also contain new allegations about former British prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and reference “10 co-conspirators” the FBI wanted to interview in July 2019, days after Epstein’s arrest and before his death in custody. The only Epstein co-conspirator charged was Ghislaine Maxwell, now serving 20 years in federal prison. 

    Who said what
    In a January 2020 email, an unidentified federal prosecutor in New York said Trump had flown on Epstein’s private jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1996, “many more times than previously has been reported (or that we were aware).” Two flights carried just Trump, Epstein and two “women who would be possible witnesses in a Maxwell case,” the email said. Last year, Trump claimed on social media he “was never on Epstein’s Plane, or at his ‘stupid’ Island.” 

    The newly released files also “include several tips that were collected by the FBI about Trump’s involvement with Epstein,” The Washington Post said, but do not indicate “whether any of the tips were corroborated.” A limousine driver in Dallas reported that during one ride, “Trump continuously stated the name ‘Jeffrey’ while on the phone, and made references to ‘abusing some girl,’” the FBI said. The driver also claimed to have spoken to a woman who alleged Trump and Epstein raped her. The Justice Department said on social media yesterday that some of the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims” about Trump that, if credible, would have already been “weaponized” against him.

    What next?
    The Epstein files release “has been marred by DOJ mishandling, and that’s continuing,” CNN said. The Justice Department sounds like “Trump’s personal lawyer,” and the documents contain “curious and heavy-handed redactions that go beyond the limits of the law.” The files “involving Epstein’s 2007 sweetheart plea deal” are so ”heavily redacted,“ it’s “almost impossible to understand” how he escaped federal prosecution, the Miami Herald said. 

     
     
    TODAY’S EDUCATION Story

    Oklahoma fires instructor for failing grade on gender essay

    What happened
    The University of Oklahoma has removed a graduate student after she gave a student a failing grade on a psychology paper that cited the Bible as proof that “belief in multiple genders” is “demonic.” A review determined that the instructor, Mel Cuth, “was arbitrary in the grading of this specific paper,” the university said Monday, and she “will no longer have instructional duties.”

    Who said what
    The junior psychology major who wrote the essay appealed her zero grade and filed a religious discrimination claim. “Her case became a flashpoint in the ongoing debate over academic freedom on college campuses” after the university suspended Cuth and struck the student’s failing grade, The Associated Press said. Conservative groups and commentators made it an “online cause, highlighting” the junior’s argument “she’d been punished for expressing conservative Christian views.”

    The University of Oklahoma’s Graduate Student Senate called Cuth’s removal “reprehensible.” The failed essay, meant to discuss academic research on gender expression and bullying in middle school, included a “prayer” that America’s youth “would not believe the lies being spread from Satan” about multiple genders. Cuth responded that the paper “does not answer the questions for the assignment,” relies on “personal ideology” and “is at times offensive,” though “I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs,” according to a screenshot posted online by the school’s Turning Point USA chapter.

    What next?
    Cuth said through a lawyer yesterday she was “considering all of her legal remedies, including appealing this decision.”

     
     

    It’s not all bad

    After losing his sight five years ago, Texas tow truck driver Christopher Jones opened a restaurant and taught himself how to cook barbecue through “touch, sound, taste” and “particularly smell,” said Good News Network. Jones uses his grandfather’s recipes at his Dallas-area restaurant, Blindfolded Barbecue in Duncanville — and customers keep coming back for more. Being a chef who’s blind is a “conversation starter,” Jones told CBS News, and he’s happy to “bring awareness to it.”

     
     
    Under the radar

    Antibiotic resistance: the latest danger for Ukraine

    Multidrug antibacterial resistance caused by the war in Ukraine is now “on the doorstep” of Western Europe, according to an Australian clinician who has worked in the war-torn country. The number of potentially lethal infections in Ukraine has increased tenfold since Russia’s 2022 invasion, and this “really frightening” level of antimicrobial resistance is on the march beyond its borders, Hailie Uren told the health site VaccinesWork. 

    Humans are host to more than a thousand species of bacteria, including some superbugs that are “deemed critical threats,” said The New York Times. Normally, they don’t “become pathogenic in healthy people,” but “war changes that.” War “deprives people of food, clean water and sanitary living conditions,” and when “bombs and bullets fly,” wounds become “perforated with shrapnel, debris and soil teeming with microbes.” 

    A “rising number of wounded soldiers” in Ukraine are being infected with microbes that are “extensively drug-resistant” and “withstand most or all antibiotics thrown at them,” said VaccinesWork. Doctors and scientists in Ukraine are waging a “shadow war” against these “pernicious infections,” which have also “begun circulating in the general population,” including children. 

    Many experts warn that the rise of superbugs resistant to antibiotics poses a greater threat to humanity than climate change. Antimicrobial resistance could contribute to the deaths of 8.22 million people a year by 2050, according to a paper published in the journal The Lancet. That’s more than the number currently killed by cancer.

     
     
    On this day

    December 24, 1943

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower supreme commander of the Allied forces in Europe. Eisenhower’s leadership would help bring about the end of World War II; less than a decade after the conflict, he was elected U.S. president.

     
     
    TODAY’S newspaperS

    ‘A little of everything’

    “Latest Epstein files name Trump many times,” the Miami Herald says on Wednesday’s front page. “Feds dismiss Trump’s links to Epstein,” the Los Angeles Times says. “Nearly 30 envoys recalled to U.S. by White House” with “no explanation given,” The New York Times says. “High court strikes blow to Trump on Guard,” The Boston Globe says. “Supreme Court: No troops to Chicago,” the Houston Chronicle says. “Internal ICE chats show ‘meme-ifcation’ of raids and arrests,” The Washington Post says. “Consumers fuel surge in growth,” The Wall Street Journal says. “Biggest GDP rise in 2 years,” says The Dallas Morning News. “A little of everything for Christmas,” says USA Today: “Warm, cold, wet, windy, rainy, snowy.” 

    ► See the newspaper front pages

     
     
    Tall tale

    Give and take

    Thieves dressed as Santa and his elves stole $3,000 worth of goods from a Metro grocery store in Montreal. The activist group Les Soulèvements du Fleuve (The River’s Uprisings) claimed credit for what it portrayed as a Robin Hood–style “redistribution,” saying its Robins des ruelles (Robins of the Alleys) crew had put the items under a neighborhood Christmas tree and in community fridges. Some businesses are “holding our vital needs hostage,” the group said on social media, and “for us, this is theft, and they are the thieves.”

     
     

    Morning Report was written and edited by Nadia Croes, Catherine Garcia, Scott Hocker, Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, Justin Klawans, Chas Newkey-Burden, Rafi Schwartz, Peter Weber and Kari Wilkin, with illustrations by Stephen Kelly and Julia Wytrazek.

    Image credits, from top: Stacey Wescott / Chicago Tribune / Tribune News Service via Getty Images; AFP via Getty Images; Kirby Lee / Getty Images; Illustration by Julia Wytrazek / Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      New year, new government shutdown

    • Morning Report

      Trump tilts at wind farms

    • Evening Review

      Why is Trump attacking Venezuela?

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.