BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz parent company Daimler have been charged by the European Union’s antitrust body with colluding to limit the use of emissions-cleaning technology.
“Daimler, VW and BMW may have broken EU competition rules,” said the European Competition Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager. “As a result, European consumers may have been denied the opportunity to buy cars with the best available technology.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to Autocar, the “scheme” is believed to have limited the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, which reduce toxic exhaust gases in diesel cars, and petrol particulate filters on models sold between 2006 and 2014.
By agreeing to limit the use of such systems, the manufacturers would not be locked in a costly development war. The alleged collusion also occurred before the VW emissions scandal escalated in 2015, a time when vehicle exhaust gases were far less of an issue than they are today.
Daimler, which informed the EU of the collusion in July 2017, told the Financial Times that it has been “co-operating extensively with the European Commission as leniency applicant already at an early stage and does not expect to receive a fine in this matter”.
VW has also stated that it is working with the EU, but emphasised that “the manufacturers are not charged with any other misconduct such as price fixing or allocating markets and customers”.
BMW, on the other hand, denies any wrongdoing and claims that it is “usual practice” for rival companies to work together to develop technologies, the FT reports.
Although the companies are invited to present any information that could alter the case, they currently face “big penalties” for breaking antitrust laws, says Autocar.
The maximum is a fine equating to 10% of the firm’s annual turnover, which is estimated to run well into the billions, the motoring magazine says.
-
How will the new Repayment Assistance Plan for student loans work?the explainer The Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) will replace existing income-driven repayment plans
-
In the Spotlight Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has been at odds with US forces
-
Music reviews: Ethel Cain, Amaarae, and The Black KeysFeature "Willoughby Tucker, I'll Always Love You," "Black Star," and "No Rain, No Flowers"
-
Volkswagen ID.5 review: what the car critics sayFeature The ID.4's 'sportier, more stylish twin' – but 'don't believe the hype'
-
Mercedes-Benz E-class review: what the car critics sayThe Week Recommends The 11th generation E-class delivers a polished drive and features a spacious interior packed with tech
-
BMW iX1 review: what the car critics sayThe Week Recommends BMW’s smallest electric crossover has ‘precise’ steering and a ‘smart interior’
-
Mercedes-AMG G63 4x4² review: what the car critics sayThe Week Recommends This truly luxurious 4x4 is pretty straightforward and off-road it feels invincible
-
BMW M3 Touring review: what the car critics sayfeature A sensational all-rounder, the car is ‘eye-wateringly, cheek-puffingly good to drive fast’
-
VW ID Buzz review: what the car critics sayfeature The new ID Buzz electric van is a modern successor to Volkswagen’s beloved Type 2
-
The pros and cons of hybrid carsPros and Cons Part-electric vehicles produce lower emissions but they may not work for every lifestyle
-
Mercedes-AMG SL review: recapturing a golden age of motoringfeature The latest SL harks back to when the first model set ‘new standards for style and comfort’
