How the wealthy are impacting climate change, by the numbers
The lifestyles of the rich and famous appear to be affecting the planet
![A helicopter landing on a luxury superyacht](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VMcd6Y7oiydoYq4Xfvo2qG-415-80.jpg)
There are around 2,600 billionaires in the world, according to Forbes, and these moguls are worth a combined $12.2 trillion. This wealth has allowed them to travel the world in private luxury vehicles. As the planet continues to feel the effects of global warming, though, studies have shown that these lifestyles are contributing to climate change.
The wealthiest individuals "make a huge contribution to climate change through carbon-hungry activities," BBC reported. It is true that "most people in wealthy countries are consuming in ways that are accelerating climate catastrophe," the outlet added. However, "Wealthy people set the tone on consumption to which everybody aspires. That's where the toxic effects are," Halina Szejnwald Brown, professor emerita of environmental science at Clark University, told BBC.
Wealthy Americans in particular "have higher carbon footprints than other wealthy people," Scientific American reported, citing a study from the World Inequality Report. Studies such as these have become abundant in recent years. But what do the figures actually show?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How are the wealthy directly contributing to climate change?
When looking specifically at the United States, "40% of total U.S. emissions were associated with income flows to the highest earning 10% of households" in 2019, according to an August 2023 study in the journal PLOS Climate. This represents earners who are bringing in around $180,000 per year, and factors in carbon emissions from industries in which each household has invested.
The top of the food chain — Americans in the top 1% of all earners — contributed disproportionately more negative environmental effects, PLOS reported, being responsible for up to 15 to 17% of carbon emissions. These Americans, who represent households making more than $550,000, had investment holdings that accounted for up to 43% of these emissions.
The top 0.1% of American earners, meanwhile, were described by PLOS as "super-emitters" of carbon emissions, especially when factoring in the ultra-wealthy with significant income from investments in carbon-heavy industries, which drives more than 50% of these individuals' emissions. These estimated 43,200 super-emitter U.S. households, whose income ranges in the multi-millions or billions, each generate around 3,000 tons of carbon pollution every year.
It's recommended that the average person "should limit their carbon footprint to around 2.3 tons a year to tackle climate change," CNN noted, meaning that "super-emitters" generate more than 1,300 times the recommended amount of pollution.
What role do private jets play?
When considering the wealthy's impact on climate change, the first thing that comes to mind is likely a private plane.
When it comes to the skies, private jets "emit at least 10 times more pollutants than commercial planes per passenger," per a recent report from the Institute for Policy Studies. While "just a small portion of these carbon emissions [4%] are due to private jet use," the report noted, "there is a stark imbalance between a jet carrying at most a handful of people...versus a commercial aircraft loaded with hundreds of passengers." This means that the ultra-wealthy "are responsible for a highly disproportionate amount of carbon emissions from air travel."
Covid-19 has exacerbated the use of chartered planes, and emissions "have increased by more than 23% as private jet use has risen by about a fifth" since the pandemic's start, Simple Flying reported. The outlet noted that for a typical flight between New York City and Washington, D.C., a private jet would "emit an estimated 7,913 pounds of CO2 per passenger." The average commercial flight would emit just 174 pounds.
What role do superyachts play?
Superyachts are "by far the worst asset to own from an environmental standpoint," Indiana University professors Richard Wilk and Beatriz Barros told DW. The outlet noted that "two-thirds of these super-rich emissions are created by...superyachts."
A study from these professors found that "a superyacht with a permanent crew, helicopter pad, submarines and pools emits about 7,020 tons of CO2 a year." But this is just an average, and some of these ships emit many more tons of emissions. Eclipse, currently the world's third-largest superyacht, is owned by billionaire Roman Abramovich and was cited by the study as giving off 22,440 tons of CO2 in 2018. Abramovich, called "the biggest polluter" by the study, was responsible in total for emitting more than 33,000 tons of CO2 from his modes of transportation.
"Whether it’s this or private jets or trips to space, they’re just sticking two fingers up at the rest of society," Peter Newell, a professor at Sussex University, told The Guardian. "They’re not comfortable with the constraints that come with accepting collective responsibility for the fate of the planet."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other Hollywood news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
Today's political cartoons - September 7, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - football widows, meddling kids, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Smoking ban: the return of the nanny state?
Talking Point Starmer's plan to revive Sunak-era war on tobacco has struck an unsettling chord even with some non-smokers
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: September 7, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Scientists want to zap coastlines with electricity
Under the Radar Beaches are in for a shock
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The Arctic is a ticking 'mercury bomb'
Under the Radar An icy prison break is on the way
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Bananas have been facing extinction. But maybe not for much longer.
under the radar Scientists may have a solution for a longstanding fungus problem
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Homeowners are getting burned by solar panel scammers
In Depth One-star reviews for solar companies have increased over 1,000% since 2018
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
China's winning battle against desertification
Under The Radar Beijing is using solar power to lead the fight as climate change intensifies the threat
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
11 looming climate tipping points that imperil our planet
The Explainer New reports detail the thresholds we may be close to crossing
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Iceberg A23a is taking a spin
Under the Radar As the iceberg turns, so too does its effect on the neighboring ecosystem
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The world's largest tropical wetland is on fire, and under threat from waterway
Under the Radar Proposed shipping route through Pantanal in Brazil could dry out biome and worsen devastating wildfires
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published