How the wealthy are impacting climate change, by the numbers
The lifestyles of the rich and famous appear to be affecting the planet
There are around 2,600 billionaires in the world, according to Forbes, and these moguls are worth a combined $12.2 trillion. This wealth has allowed them to travel the world in private luxury vehicles. As the planet continues to feel the effects of global warming, though, studies have shown that these lifestyles are contributing to climate change.
The wealthiest individuals "make a huge contribution to climate change through carbon-hungry activities," BBC reported. It is true that "most people in wealthy countries are consuming in ways that are accelerating climate catastrophe," the outlet added. However, "Wealthy people set the tone on consumption to which everybody aspires. That's where the toxic effects are," Halina Szejnwald Brown, professor emerita of environmental science at Clark University, told BBC.
Wealthy Americans in particular "have higher carbon footprints than other wealthy people," Scientific American reported, citing a study from the World Inequality Report. Studies such as these have become abundant in recent years. But what do the figures actually show?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How are the wealthy directly contributing to climate change?
When looking specifically at the United States, "40% of total U.S. emissions were associated with income flows to the highest earning 10% of households" in 2019, according to an August 2023 study in the journal PLOS Climate. This represents earners who are bringing in around $180,000 per year, and factors in carbon emissions from industries in which each household has invested.
The top of the food chain — Americans in the top 1% of all earners — contributed disproportionately more negative environmental effects, PLOS reported, being responsible for up to 15 to 17% of carbon emissions. These Americans, who represent households making more than $550,000, had investment holdings that accounted for up to 43% of these emissions.
The top 0.1% of American earners, meanwhile, were described by PLOS as "super-emitters" of carbon emissions, especially when factoring in the ultra-wealthy with significant income from investments in carbon-heavy industries, which drives more than 50% of these individuals' emissions. These estimated 43,200 super-emitter U.S. households, whose income ranges in the multi-millions or billions, each generate around 3,000 tons of carbon pollution every year.
It's recommended that the average person "should limit their carbon footprint to around 2.3 tons a year to tackle climate change," CNN noted, meaning that "super-emitters" generate more than 1,300 times the recommended amount of pollution.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What role do private jets play?
When considering the wealthy's impact on climate change, the first thing that comes to mind is likely a private plane.
When it comes to the skies, private jets "emit at least 10 times more pollutants than commercial planes per passenger," per a recent report from the Institute for Policy Studies. While "just a small portion of these carbon emissions [4%] are due to private jet use," the report noted, "there is a stark imbalance between a jet carrying at most a handful of people...versus a commercial aircraft loaded with hundreds of passengers." This means that the ultra-wealthy "are responsible for a highly disproportionate amount of carbon emissions from air travel."
Covid-19 has exacerbated the use of chartered planes, and emissions "have increased by more than 23% as private jet use has risen by about a fifth" since the pandemic's start, Simple Flying reported. The outlet noted that for a typical flight between New York City and Washington, D.C., a private jet would "emit an estimated 7,913 pounds of CO2 per passenger." The average commercial flight would emit just 174 pounds.
What role do superyachts play?
Superyachts are "by far the worst asset to own from an environmental standpoint," Indiana University professors Richard Wilk and Beatriz Barros told DW. The outlet noted that "two-thirds of these super-rich emissions are created by...superyachts."
A study from these professors found that "a superyacht with a permanent crew, helicopter pad, submarines and pools emits about 7,020 tons of CO2 a year." But this is just an average, and some of these ships emit many more tons of emissions. Eclipse, currently the world's third-largest superyacht, is owned by billionaire Roman Abramovich and was cited by the study as giving off 22,440 tons of CO2 in 2018. Abramovich, called "the biggest polluter" by the study, was responsible in total for emitting more than 33,000 tons of CO2 from his modes of transportation.
"Whether it’s this or private jets or trips to space, they’re just sticking two fingers up at the rest of society," Peter Newell, a professor at Sussex University, told The Guardian. "They’re not comfortable with the constraints that come with accepting collective responsibility for the fate of the planet."
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
Why Saudi Arabia is muscling in on the world of animeUnder the Radar The anime industry is the latest focus of the kingdom’s ‘soft power’ portfolio
-
Scoundrels, spies and squires in January TVthe week recommends This month’s new releases include ‘The Pitt,’ ‘Industry,’ ‘Ponies’ and ‘A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms’
-
Venezuela: The ‘Donroe doctrine’ takes shapeFeature President Trump wants to impose “American dominance”
-
How drones detected a deadly threat to Arctic whalesUnder the radar Monitoring the sea in the air
-
‘Jumping genes’: how polar bears are rewiring their DNA to survive the warming ArcticUnder the radar The species is adapting to warmer temperatures
-
Environment breakthroughs of 2025In Depth Progress was made this year on carbon dioxide tracking, food waste upcycling, sodium batteries, microplastic monitoring and green concrete
-
Crest falling: Mount Rainier and 4 other mountains are losing heightUnder the radar Its peak elevation is approximately 20 feet lower than it once was
-
Death toll from Southeast Asia storms tops 1,000speed read Catastrophic floods and landslides have struck Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia
-
Can for-profit geoengineering put a pause on climate change?In the Spotlight Stardust Solutions wants to dim the sun. Scientists are worried.
-
How will climate change affect the UK?The Explainer Met Office projections show the UK getting substantially warmer and wetter – with more extreme weather events
-
Can the UK do more on climate change?Today's Big Question Labour has shown leadership in the face of fraying international consensus, but must show the public their green mission is ‘a net benefit, not a net cost’
