'Three-parent babies': MPs to vote on divisive legislation
Britain could become first country in the world to permit 'three-parent babies' if legislation accepted
MPs will vote today on the divisive issue of "three-parent babies", in which a couple uses the DNA of a second woman to repair genetic faults in an unborn child.
The technique would help about 150 couples a year, where there is a risk of the mother passing down defective mitochondria – tiny compartments inside nearly every cell in the body – which can lead to brain damage, muscle wasting, heart failure and blindness.
A modified version of IVF combines the DNA of two parents with the healthy mitochondria of a second donor woman, producing a baby with 0.1 per cent of its DNA from the third parent.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
If the amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 go through, Britain will become the first country in the world to permit three-parent babies, the first of whom could be born as early as next year, says the BBC.
But the vote, which is due to take place this afternoon, has already sparked a fierce moral and medical debate, as the genetic change will be passed on through generations, with any unexpected issues affecting people who are not yet born.
The Catholic Church and the Church of England have raised ethical and medical concerns, urging politicians not to rush into the decision.
But a number of leading scientists, including five Nobel laureates, called on MPs to support the legislation. In a letter to The Times, they wrote: "We believe that those who know what it is like to care for, and sometimes to lose, an extremely sick child are the people best placed to decide whether this technology is right for them, with medical advice and within the strict regulatory framework proposed. They have been waiting for the science for long enough. They should not have to wait for the law to catch up."
Signatories included Sir Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society; Sir John Gurdon, who won the 2012 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine; and the Rt Rev Lord Harries, a former bishop of Oxford.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drug
Speed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
By The Week Staff Published
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policy
Speed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
By The Week Staff Published
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?
Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UK
Speed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakers
Speed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
By The Week Staff Published
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’
Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Motherhood: why are we putting it off?
Speed Read Stats show around 50% of women in England and Wales now don’t have children by 30
By The Week Staff Published
-
Anti-Semitism in America: a case of double standards?
Speed Read Officials were strikingly reluctant to link Texas synagogue attack to anti-Semitism
By The Week Staff Published