Are the generals undercutting Biden like they undercut Trump?


President Biden and top military officials are telling different stories about their planning process to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
"I recommended that we maintain 2,500 troops in Afghanistan, and I also recommended early in the fall of 2020 that we maintain 4,500 at that time, those were my personal views," Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. Gen. Mark Milley, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said much the same thing: His view "back in the fall of 2020, [which] remained consistent throughout, [was] that we should keep a steady state of 2,500 and it could bounce up to 3,500, maybe, something like that, in order to move toward a negotiated solution."
That's not what Biden said to ABC News' George Stephanopoulos in a mid-August interview. Then, Biden indicated he had either not received such advice or it did not reflect the consensus. "No, they didn't. It was split. That wasn't true. That wasn't true," the president said. "No. No one said that to me that I can recall." The White House reiterated that account Tuesday.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Congressional Republicans are focused on whether Biden was telling the truth, which is important. But they shouldn't lose sight of another question: whether the generals are following the directives of the elected, civilian commander-in-chief. We know they slow-walked former President Donald Trump on Afghanistan withdrawal and other issues, even before he gave last-minute directives at the end of his term.
Where generals once pushed back on Trump, often with the media's approval, are they undercutting Biden in retrospect now? Is this bureaucratic buck-passing, or perhaps a warning to the next president who disregards the brass?
Generals provide political leaders with important expert and strategic advice, as is appropriate. But in the age of forever wars, when your only tool is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. That's a major reason generals don't make the final decision to invade, stay, or go.
There was no Afghan state powerful enough to prevent a Taliban takeover, and the U.S. military could not wish or bomb one into existence. While the war continued, how to forestall the inevitable was up to the generals. But whether to continue the war is up to the people, our elected representatives — and our elected president. Generals can advise, but they shouldn't be an obstacle to presidents who choose to end an aimless war.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Gandhi arrests: Narendra Modi's 'vendetta' against India's opposition
The Explainer Another episode threatens to spark uproar in the Indian PM's long-running battle against the country's first family
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
How the woke right gained power in the US
Under the radar The term has grown in prominence since Donald Trump returned to the White House
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK
-
Codeword: April 24, 2025
The Week's daily codeword puzzle
By The Week Staff
-
How the woke right gained power in the US
Under the radar The term has grown in prominence since Donald Trump returned to the White House
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK
-
A running list of RFK Jr.'s controversies
In Depth The man atop the Department of Health and Human Services has had no shortage of scandals over the years
By Brigid Kennedy
-
IMF sees slump from tariffs, Trump tries to calm markets
Speed Read The International Monetary Fund predicts the U.S. and global economies will slow significantly due to the president's trade war
By Peter Weber, The Week US
-
Climate: Trump's attempt to bring back coal
Feature Trump rolls back climate policies with executive orders aimed at reviving the coal industry
By The Week US
-
Trump's budget: Gutting Medicaid to pass tax cuts?
Feature To extend Trump's tax cuts, the GOP is looking to cut Medicaid and other assistance programs
By The Week US
-
Trump tariffs place trucking industry in the crosshairs
IN THE SPOTLIGHT As the White House barrels ahead with its massive tariff project, American truckers are feeling the heat from a global trade war
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
Trump stands by Hegseth amid ouster reports
Speed Read The president dismissed reports that he was on the verge of firing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over a second national security breach
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
Corruption: The road to crony capitalism
Feature Trump's tariff pause sent the stock market soaring — was it insider trading?
By The Week US