Smart Motorways: a U-turn too late?
Government cancels plans to create more of the controversial highways but existing ones remain

In one of his essays, George Orwell pilloried the use of “political language” – consisting “largely of euphemism, question begging and sheer cloudy vagueness”, said Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express.
A prime modern example of such “linguistic deceit and waffle” is the term “smart motorway”, to describe a road in which the hard shoulder has been turned into a live lane.
‘Active traffic management’
The Government embraced the idea as a means of easing congestion; and traffic planners assured worried motorists that with “active traffic management” – radar-based cameras and electronic signs – they’d be safe if they broke down in “thundering traffic” without access to a dedicated emergency space.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But campaigners were never convinced, and now – following a spate of deadly accidents – the Government has finally come to its senses: last week, it decreed that plans for more smart motorways (14 schemes in total) will all be cancelled.
Smart motorways were an “unsafe” idea, delivered with “hubris and denial even after the human cost became evident”, said Oliver Duff in The i Paper. In the five years to 2020, at least 38 people were killed on these “death traps”.
And then there are all the non-fatal accidents, and near misses: any driver who has experienced a tyre blow out at 70mph will shudder to imagine how terrifying that would be on a road where the hard shoulder has become the “default lane for HGVs”. Campaigners are now calling for all existing smart motorways to be scrapped too.
‘Blood on their hands’
The policy dates back to 2006, when Tony Blair’s government was warned that congestion was costing the country £20bn a year, said Tony Diver in The Daily Telegraph – but that widening motorways would cost even more. Smart roads, which could be created for about a tenth of the cost per mile of installing new lanes, seemed a solution. Although they were warned about the risks, later governments pressed ahead – and even eroded the number of pull-in spots, to cut costs further, so that on the newest motorways, these only come every 2.5km.
For years, I have been asking ministers a simple question, said Edmund King, president of the AA, in the same paper. Would they rather break down on a road with a chance of reaching a hard shoulder – or on one where they’d have to pray that they’d be spotted in a live lane; pray that the control centre activates a warning; pray that a Red X comes up; and pray that other drivers heed it?
The terrible irony is that smart motorways don’t even cut congestion, partly because a third of drivers avoid using the inside lane for fear of ploughing into a stationary car. That this policy ever went ahead is a scandal; those involved have “blood on their hands”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The Week contest: Flight fraud
Puzzles and Quizzes
-
Is Trump sidelining Congress' war powers?
Today's Big Question The Iran attack renews a long-running debate
-
6 productivity-ready homes with great offices
Feature Featuring an office with a gas fireplace in Oregon and a shared workspace with wraparound windows in Massachusetts
-
RFK Jr.: How to destroy vaccination
Feature Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaces all 17 members of the federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice
-
ICE: Targeting essential workers
Feature After a brief pause, the Trump administration resumes its mass deportation plan
-
'No Kings': A turning point for the resistance?
Feature Millions of Americans nationwide took to the streets to protest against the Trump administration
-
Trump: Making the military into a 'partisan militia'?
Feature Donald Trump held a military parade just days after sending troops to stop protests in Los Angeles
-
Is the US sliding into autocracy?
Talking Point Donald Trump's use of federal troops on home ground, dismissal of dissent and 'braggadocious' military posturing are all symptoms of a shifting political culture
-
Will Iranians revolt?
Talking Point The chasm between Iran's rulers and their subjects is 'as great now as it was when Iranians toppled the Shah'
-
Travel ban: It's back and it's bigger
Feature Trump revives a controversial travel ban, targeting mostly poor, nonwhite countries
-
Discrimination: Expanding the definition
Feature The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a straight woman who sued her gay boss for discrimination