Government minister Tom Tugendhat is being prosecuted behind closed doors after he was caught using his mobile phone while driving.
Although the security minister told officers he was using his phone to navigate, he was prosecuted by the Met Police as he already had six penalty points on his driving licence. An officer said: “The device was being held in his left hand. The driver appeared to be having a conversation.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Evening Standard revealed that the case will be dealt with at Bromley Magistrates’ Court today under the single justice procedure, where prosecutions are heard in private.
If convicted, he would face a fine and a further six points on his licence, which could mean a six-month driving ban. A spokesman for Tugendhat said he “put himself on a driving course of his own volition” after the incident and “accepts that holding his phone while driving is an offence”.
Tugendhat informed the Home Office permanent secretary about the driving offence after he was appointed as a minister in September, reported the BBC.
Single justice procedure (SJP) courts sit in private across England and Wales with just one magistrate deciding on criminal cases. Hundreds of thousands of people are convicted each year in the courts, which were introduced in 2015.
However, said the Evening Standard, “disgruntled magistrates” are refusing to sit in secretive court hearings because they believe the system is “watering down justice”.
MPs have also expressed concern, noted The Justice Gap magazine. The House of Commons justice committee has recommended that the Ministry of Justice review the procedure and seek to “enhance its transparency by publishing case information in a timely fashion”.
-
5 cinematic cartoons about Bezos betting big on 'Melania'Cartoons Artists take on a girlboss, a fetching newspaper, and more
-
The fall of the generals: China’s military purgeIn the Spotlight Xi Jinping’s extraordinary removal of senior general proves that no-one is safe from anti-corruption drive that has investigated millions
-
Why the Gorton and Denton by-election is a ‘Frankenstein’s monster’Talking Point Reform and the Greens have the Labour seat in their sights, but the constituency’s complex demographics make messaging tricky
-
The Mandelson files: Labour Svengali’s parting gift to StarmerThe Explainer Texts and emails about Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador could fuel biggest political scandal ‘for a generation’
-
Three consequences from the Jenrick defectionThe Explainer Both Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage may claim victory, but Jenrick’s move has ‘all-but ended the chances of any deal to unite the British right’
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
What does the fall in net migration mean for the UK?Today’s Big Question With Labour and the Tories trying to ‘claim credit’ for lower figures, the ‘underlying picture is far less clear-cut’
-
Five takeaways from Plaid Cymru’s historic Caerphilly by-election winThe Explainer The ‘big beasts’ were ‘humbled’ but there was disappointment for second-placed Reform too
-
The new age of book banningThe Explainer How America’s culture wars collided with parents and legislators who want to keep their kids away from ‘dangerous’ ideas
