“Joe Biden’s visit to Europe at a time of acute crisis for the continent should have been a reassuring event,” said The Daily Telegraph. That it turned into a “gaffe-strewn embarrassment” was not just unfortunate – it was “dangerous”.
“The very suggestion feeds into the Kremlin’s paranoia that the West is intent on destroying their country, a view inculcated into the Russian psyche for centuries.” For a month, Nato had supported a single, clear aim, said Patrick Wintour in The Guardian: “the defence of the territorial integrity of Ukraine”. Now the position has been blurred.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A US official tried to explain it away, saying: “The president’s point was Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbours or the region.” But it was too late. The Kremlin propaganda machine ran the clip of Biden’s words again and again. It will make negotiations more difficult: Putin can claim there is no point in talks, that it’s “all or nothing”.
Biden’s remark has also revived claims that he is suffering from “serious cognitive decline”, said Hugh Tomlinson in The Times. It was only his latest diplomatic misstep. In January “he appeared to throw Ukraine under the bus”, stating that a “minor incursion” into its territory by Russia would not merit a powerful international response.
Actually, this wasn’t a gaffe, said Jennifer Rubin in The Washington Post. Biden gave a perfectly good explanation of his own words: he wasn’t calling for regime change in Russia, but was expressing his personal “moral outrage” at Putin’s “brutality”. And who could argue with that? In Berlin in 1987, Ronald Reagan famously called on Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this wall”. At the time, his advisers thought he was being too confrontational. But Reagan was absolutely right – and so was Biden.
-
Motherland: a ‘brilliantly executed’ feminist history of modern RussiaThe Week Recommends Moscow-born journalist Julia Ioffe examines the women of her country over the past century
-
Russia’s Shadow FleetThe Explainer A growing number of uninsured and falsely registered vessels are entering international waters, dodging EU sanctions on Moscow’s oil and gas
-
Revisionism and division: Franco’s legacy five decades onIn The Spotlight Events to mark 50 years since Franco’s death designed to break young people’s growing fascination with the Spanish dictator
-
Dick Cheney: the vice president who led the War on Terrorfeature Cheney died this month at the age of 84
-
The ‘Kavanaugh stop’Feature Activists say a Supreme Court ruling has given federal agents a green light to racially profile Latinos
-
Affordability: Does Trump have an answer?Feature Trump ‘refuses to admit there is a problem’
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
-
Massacre in the favela: Rio’s police take on the gangsIn the Spotlight The ‘defence operation’ killed 132 suspected gang members, but could spark ‘more hatred and revenge’
-
Obamacare: Why premiums are rocketingFeature The rise is largely due to the Dec. 31 expiration of pandemic-era ‘enhanced’ premium subsidies, which are at the heart of the government shutdown
-
The GOP: Will it welcome antisemites?Feature That Carlson would grant Fuentes access to his massive audience is proof that his hate ‘is entering the MAGA mainstream’
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
