Republicans now boost sanctuary cities — but for guns


Remember when Republicans hated sanctuary cities?
One of the first things Donald Trump did after becoming president was to go after those jurisdictions — usually run by Democrats — which officially declined to assist the federal government in its immigration crackdown, ordering that federal grants be withheld from local and state agencies following such policies. The courts eventually knocked down the administration challenge to California's law limiting cooperation with immigration authorities, ruling the feds cannot commandeer state officials to enforce laws they oppose. Still, Trump continued to rail against sanctuary cities throughout his presidency, even threatening at one point to withhold pandemic aid.
"If you're going to get aid to the cities and states for the kind of numbers you're talking about, billions of dollars, I don't think you should have sanctuary cities," he said in April 2020.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump is no longer in the White House. President Biden has repealed his predecessor's anti-sanctuary directives. And Republican attitudes about cooperating with the federal government have seemingly flipped too.
Missouri Gov. Mike Parsons (R) last weekend signed a bill prohibiting his state's law enforcement agencies from enforcing federal gun laws. (At least eight other states have passed similar laws this year.) In a Thursday letter to the Department of Justice, Parsons and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt specifically cited Biden's sanctuary cities policy in their defense.
"President Biden and the Department of Justice have decided to reward states and cities that refuse to cooperate with enforcing constitutional immigration laws that protect our citizens against foreign threats, but now they attack Missouri for refusing to cooperate with enforcing unconstitutional gun confiscation laws that put our citizens in danger and degrade their rights," the Missourians wrote. "You cannot have it both ways."
One can quibble with the pair's characterization of immigration and gun laws, but their bottom-line point — "You cannot have it both ways" — is probably fair. It also works in reverse: Having cited sanctuary cities in defense of guns, Republicans will be hard-pressed to make an honest argument against them next time the party controls the federal government. With Democrats in power, though, the GOP has suddenly remembered it is the party of federalism.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Wall Street has coined a new term for Trump's tariff threats
Feature TACO stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'
-
Trump's LA immigration showdown casts shadow over upcoming World Cup
IN THE SPOTLIGHT Amid a massive anti-immigrant detention push, analysts have begun to worry over the United States' plan to host one of the world's biggest athletic events
-
Weinstein convicted of sex crime in retrial
Speed Read The New York jury delivered a mixed and partial verdict at the disgraced Hollywood producer's retrial
-
Is Trump's LA troop deployment about order or authoritarianism?
Talking Points President: 'We're going to have troops everywhere.'
-
Musk: What did he achieve in Washington?
Feature Elon Musk leaves his government job but not after bruising his image, slashing aid and firing thousands
-
GOP megabill would limit judicial oversight of Trump
speed read The domestic policy bill Republicans pushed through the House would protect the Trump administration from the consequences of violating court orders
-
Medicaid: Will millions lose coverage?
Feature House Republicans have proposed a plan to cut Medicaid coverage for millions to help fund the GOP's tax cuts
-
A running list of Trump's conflicts of interest
In Depth A potential Qatari plane is the latest in a series of problematic connections
-
Is Trump trying to take over Congress?
Talking Points Separation of powers at stake in Library of Congress fight
-
Why do GOP lawmakers want to ban state-level AI regulation?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION House Republicans are pushing to block states from making their own AI laws for the next ten years, even as expert warn the results could be disastrous.
-
Will Republicans tax the rich?
Today's Big Question Trump is waffling on the possibility of taxing wealthy earners